Scholars Debate “Jezebel” Seal


Back to Scholar’s Study

Even before it went to press, Marjo Korpel’s recent BAR article, “Fit for a Queen: Jezebel’s Royal Seal,” made a splash. Professor Korpel’s bold identification of a seal with the infamous Biblical Jezebel—a claim based on a reconstruction of the artifact—elicited a major critical furor.

The first response came from paleographer Christopher Rollston, who posted his critique online. In response to what he felt was unfair treatment of Korpel by Rollston, BAR Editor Hershel Shanks penned a response, entitled “Is It Tenable?Rollston quickly replied…followed again by Shanks. Other major scholars, Amihai Mazar and Ryan Byrne, have since weighed in, and Korpel has written a response to her critics. Read these critiques for yourself—and add your voice to the debate!

Fit for a Queen: Jezebel’s Royal Seal
Byrne: Where Is Jezebel?
Rollston Reponds to Shanks
Shanks Responds to Rollston
Rollston Critique of the Jezebel Seal Theory
Shanks: Is it “Tenable”?
Mazar: Too Late for Jezebel
Korpel Responds to her Critics


Read Janet Howe Gaines’s article “How Bad Was Jezebel?” online for free as it appeared in Bible Review.

Related Posts

Giotto adoration of the magi
Dec 19
Herod’s Death, Jesus’ Birth and a Lunar Eclipse

By: Biblical Archaeology Society Staff

Nag Hammadi Codex
Oct 2
Nag Hammadi Codices

By: Marek Dospěl

Abraham's Angels
Jul 22
Wordplay in Genesis

By: Philip D. Stern

Nov 4
New Old Torah Scroll

By: Marek Dospěl

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Send this to a friend