Did Smith forge the famous Clement letter containing two passages from a secret and different copy of the Gospel of Mark? A number of scholars have concluded, on inadequate grounds in our view, that Smith was a forger. In a four-part treatment, including contributions by eminent New Testament scholars Helmut Koester and Charles Hedrick, BAR concluded that Smith, now dead, was innocent. BAR has also engaged a handwriting expert to compare the handwriting in which the Clement letter was written with Greek handwriting known to be Smith’s, as well as an eminent Greek paleographer to assess whether the handwriting of the Clement letter is in an authentic 18th-century Greek script.
Explore below Morton Smith’s translation of “Secret Mark,” expert handwriting analyses, responses to the handwriting analysis reports, and continuing debates over the authenticity of the document.
• Translation of “Secret Mark”
• Venetia Anastasopoulou’s 36-Page Handwrting Analysis
• Peter Jeffery: Response to Handwriting Analysis
• Venetia Anastasopoulou: Can a Document in Itself Reveal a Forgery?
• Peter Jeffery: Additional Response to Handwriting Analysis
|• Scott Brown: My Thoughts on the Reports by Venetia Anastasopoulou
• Allan J. Pantuck: Solving the Mysterion of Morton Smith and the Secret Gospel of Mark
• Beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Response to Allan J. Pantuck
• Agamemnon Tselikas’ Handwriting Analysis Report
• Allan J. Pantuck: Response to Tselikas Handwriting Analysis
• Agamemnon Tselikas: Response to Allan J. Pantuck
Stephen Carlson declined our invitation to respond.
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the world of Bible history with a BAS All-Access membership. Biblical Archaeology Review in print. AND online access to the treasure trove of articles, books, and videos of the BAS Library. AND free Scholar Series lectures online. AND member discounts for BAS travel and live online events.Subscribe Today