By Charlie Trimm
(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2022), xxx + 117 pp., maps and photos, $14.99 (paperback)
Reviewed by Ronald S. Hendel
The biblical command to destroy the Canaanites is troubling. In Deuteronomy 7:1-2, Moses instructs the Israelites: “When YHWH your God … clears away many nations before you … you must utterly destroy them” (author’s translation). This command is fulfilled by Joshua and his army, and Joshua 10:40-43 offers a breathtaking picture of the violent destruction of the peoples of Canaan. In modern terms, we may call this a war of genocide. How is the reader of the Bible to understand the ethics of this utter destruction, including the killing of every woman, man, and child? How can we comprehend a God who commands such things? These questions have troubled interpreters for millennia.
Charlie Trimm, a biblical scholar at Biola University, has written a very readable exploration of these issues. He opens the book with the refreshing admission that he cannot solve the moral problem. Rather, he sets out to contextualize the issue, present a variety of interpretations, and note the weaknesses in each alternative, offering thus a fuller picture of the problem.
Trimm first describes the concepts and practices of war in the ancient Near East, the question of genocide in antiquity, and the identity of the Canaanites. He points out that ancient war involves the ideology of the king as the protector of cosmic order who must periodically vanquish the forces of chaos. The history of warfare is filled with this ideology, from ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia to current wars across the globe. This ideology informs concepts of biblical warfare as well.
The book then turns to assess four major proposals that have been advanced to solve the ethical problem of divinely commanded genocide. These proposals are: (1) God is not good; (2) the Old Testament is not an accurate record; (3) the Old Testament does not describe the destruction as a genocide; and (4) the mass killing of the Canaanites was justified. Trimm has hard criticism for each. The first option, Trimm argues, would lead us to reject the whole package of monotheism. The second disregards scripture as divinely inspired. The third is dishonest toward the biblical text. And the fourth, according to Trimm, would practically associate God with genocide.
However, it becomes clear only in the second part of the book that Trimm is committed to a high doctrine of the inerrancy of scripture, meaning that he considers the Bible to be utterly truthful. Consequently, he holds that the destruction of the Canaanites must have happened historically, because it is told in the Old Testament and affirmed in the New Testament (Acts 7:45; Acts 13:19). As BAR readers know, however, there are serious historical problems with the biblical accounts of the conquest of Canaan. For instance, Jericho and Ai weren’t inhabited in the era in question, so the story of their destruction by Joshua and his army cannot be historically accurate. Second, other biblical accounts, such as Judges 1:19-33, contradict the picture of a total destruction.
The archaeological evidence indicates that the rise of Israel was a relatively peaceful process. The early Israelites were mostly local Canaanites who settled in the previously sparsely populated highlands. Any battles with Canaanites would have occurred later, with the expansion of Israel into lowland valleys (as in Judges 5). The wholesale destruction of the Canaanites is a later historiographical fiction. The story may still be morally troubling, but we shouldn’t assume that it really happened.
Another problem that Trimm glosses over is Joshua’s destruction of the indigenous giants of Canaan, called the Anakim, Nephilim, and other ethnonyms. Joshua 11:21 describes their utter destruction along with the people of Canaan. Trimm suggests that the annihilation of the Nephilim is not a moral problem. But is the destruction of fictional giants wholly different from the destruction of fictional Canaanites? There is clearly a moral difference between actual and fictional genocide, including monsters and humans.
A final critique is that Trimm does not address the one text where the biblical writers take a position on the moral problem of the destruction of the Canaanites: Deuteronomy 20. In his laws of war, Moses contrasts the total destruction of the Canaanites with the more compassionate rules for war against other peoples. The normal rule of war that applies to all the towns beyond the territory of Canaan is to first offer terms of peace (Deuteronomy 20:10). In Canaan, however, the Israelites are commanded to “not let anything that breathes remain alive” (Deuteronomy 20:15-16).
This text perceives the moral problem and limits it by placing the conquest of Canaan in a separate category, never to be repeated. In understated fashion, it shows a moral horror of genocide, prohibiting it in future circumstances. This biblical text grapples with the moral problem of the destruction of the Canaanites and, as part of the process, produces a legal innovation—the conduct of just war. This may not solve all the problems of the destruction of the Canaanites, but in an important sense, it overcomes the problem by creating a new ethics of war. These rules form the basis for modern concepts of just war and human rights. And this interpretation has the advantage of being biblical.
Ronald S. Hendel is Professor of Hebrew Bible and Jewish Studies in the Department of Near Eastern Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He is an expert on the Hebrew Bible.
Hazor Excavations’ Amnon Ben-Tor Reveals Who Conquered Biblical Canaanites
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access membership. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today!Subscribe Today
Utterly a misinterpretation of scripture point in fact Canaan the youngest son of C(H)am had 11 sons at point way before the Exodus the Canaanites were struck and scattered according A. Custance indigenous people in the Americas and the Southern , Northern , Eastern portions of the Eurasian land mass as well as Oceania are the the lands that God drove them to thus a remnant of 7 nations occupied the Levant at the Time of Joshua’s conquest and even then the Children of Israel failed to drove them out and subsequently intermarried with the sons of Canaan !!!!!
BAR militantly uses vicarious contextual presupposition and compares it t contemporary precepts of genoside….God is God, to promote otherwise forces God out of his authority and subjects Him to critical analysis without any knowledge of his plan for man. What God created he can. may and will eventually destroy because of those who follow their own devises and refuse to obey his commands, and ordinances…Christ said “You have heard it said…” And so we have. Chose or lose.
Is the final paragraph Mr. Trimm’s opinion or the article author’s?
After summarizing Trimm’s book, the reviewer inserts his opinion as fact. The reviewer is obviously a #2: The O.T. is inaccurate and not inspired by God. Ai and Jericho as unoccupied he thinks is proven truth and it is not. The Bible is in error while archaeologists are infallible it appears to him. Not a very objective or informed review. An informed article on the facts is published by The Associates for Biblical Research: https://biblearchaeology.org/research/chronological-categories/conquest-of-canaan/3625-the-walls-of-jericho
In his consideration of defining “Genocide”, and it’s corresponding ‘Rules’, what is the authors response to The Flood ??!!
I think during THESE post-flood godless times in the Old Testament, the major percentages of the World’s inhabitants had AGAIN chosen to turn their backs on the true God, and as Isaiah said, “Like sheep…ALL had gone astray” and were doing their own thing !
Almighty God, at THIS juncture in history, was in the process of carving out from Earth’s inhabitants, a “Chosen People” to establish a representation of Heaven, based on obedience to God’s principles, codes of conduct and an individual moral compass…..in hopes of eventually influencing the rest of the planet !
To summarize……I think God was growing weary of the “clay” telling the “potter” how to craft his art !!!