The “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” Papyrus Revisited
Harvard Divinity School declares the papyrus ancient, but the debate rages on
The Harvard Theological Review recently published scientific testing on a papyrus including the text“Jesus said to them, ‘My wife …’” Photo: B.D. Colen and Joseph M. Azzarelli, via the Harvard Divinity School.
In September 2012, Harvard’s Hollis Chair of Divinity Karen L. King announced the discovery of a Coptic papyrus fragment that includes the text “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife …’” After an extended silence while the papyrus was subjected to extensive scientific tests, Harvard’s Divinity School announced that “testing indicates ‘Gospel of Jesus’s Wife’ papyrus fragment to be ancient,” following the April 2014 issue of Harvard Theological Review’s (HTR) publication of carbon-14, paleographical, spectroscopy and other scientific analyses. Harvard Divinity School’s website includes updated images, Q & A and other resources on the papyrus.
However, the subject is still open for debate. In the second postscript to his forward in the same issue of HTR, Brown University’s Leo Depuydt writes, “All this still leaves me personally 100% convinced that the Wife of Jesus Fragment is a forgery.”
When King announced the discovery of the fragment in 2012, she clearly stated that the text implied that some early Christian populations believed that Jesus had a wife—not that Jesus was, in fact, married. Even still, if the papyrus is legitimate, it holds implications for the status of women in early Christianity, as well as the tradition of a celibate priesthood. As soon as the papyrus was announced, the story spread like wildfire in the popular media, and myriad scholarly responses swiftly followed soon after. While King had consulted a small cohort of eminent scholars who defended the fragment’s authenticity, others were quick to declare it a forgery.
Just when the debate regarding the authenticity of the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” reached a fevered pitch, it was silenced. The Harvard Theological Review pulled King’s article, and Smithsonian suspended the airing of a documentary about the papyrus. HTR announced that the fragment would undergo testing, though the lack of specific information frustrated interested scholars and journalists.
The “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” is back in the April 2014 issue of Harvard Theological Review. HTR gives the papyrus fragment considerable treatment beyond Karen L. King’s critical presentation of the papyrus; the issue includes a paleographic analysis by Malcolm Choat, a chemical ink analysis by James T. Yardley and Alexis Hagadorn, microspectroscopy results by Joseph M. Azzarelli, John B. Goods and Timothy M. Swager, spectrometry radiocarbon analyses by Gregory Hodgins and Noreen Tuross, a condemnation as a forgery by Leo Depuydt, and, finally, a response by Karen L. King.
Update: Read new developments in this case in “Is the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife a Fake?,” “Owner of the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Papyrus Unmasked” and “Timeline of the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Saga.”
Multispectral image taken by a team led by Michael B. Toth, President, R. B. Toth Associates, and processed by William Christens-Barry, Imaging Scientist, Equipoise Imaging, LLC, supported by Ken Boydston, via the Harvard Divinity School.
While carbon-14 tests did not provide reliable dates (initial tests placed the fragment before the birth of Jesus, and secondary testing provided dates in the 8th century C.E.), King suggests that the carbon dating, in conjunction with analysis of the carbon “lamp black” pigments, “supports the conclusion that the papyrus and ink of GJW are ancient.” According to paleographer Malcolm Choat, the “handwriting and the manner in which it has been written do not provide definitive grounds for proving” that the fragment is a forgery. The only dissenting view published in the Harvard Theological Review is voiced by Leo Depuydt (though many others have been voiced in other—especially online—publications. See more below.), who sees “grammatical blunders” in the text that suggest that it is “entirely a patchwork of words and phrases from the Gospel of Thomas.”
Karen L. King discussed the papyrus fragment, the recent scientific testing and the implications of such a new “gospel” with WGBH News:
Since the publication of the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” in the latest issue of Harvard Theological Review, many scholars have published their responses online. University of Notre Dame scholar Candida Moss eloquently summarizes the debate, suggesting that while the popular media has been quick to call the papyrus authentic, the debatable date of the ink has left the “scholarly community […] less enthusiastic about the discovery.”
Our free eBook Ten Top Biblical Archaeology Discoveries brings together the exciting worlds of archaeology and the Bible! Learn the fascinating insights gained from artifacts and ruins, like the Pool of Siloam in Jerusalem, where the Gospel of John says Jesus miraculously restored the sight of the blind man, and the Tel Dan inscription—the first historical evidence of King David outside the Bible.
New Testament scholar Larry Hurtado supplied his initial thoughts and further observations, and highlights from his commentary have been noted by Bob Cargill. Christopher Rollston has discussed the ink, forgery and epigraphy, and James Tabor has provided a series of links contextualizing the backstory. The NT Blog, written by Duke University’s Mark Goodacre, has been my primary source for finding scholarly reactions to the HTR publications, and I recommend that our readers continue to visit Goodacre’s blog for the latest updates on the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife.” Within the NT Blog, I want to point out two important dissenting papers regarding the authenticity of the fragment, posted as pdf files: Leo Depuydt’s response to Karen King’s response as well as an additional critical response by Durham’s Francis Watson.
In addition to the wide range of responses by Biblical scholars, I also want to direct readers to an interesting piece of investigative journalism by LiveScience’s Owen Jarus, who delves into the matter of King’s source for the papyrus, raising questions about the fragment’s purchase in East German Potsdam over fifty years ago.
The rapid-fire web publications on the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” range from resourceful to fingerpointing, and Paleojudaica’s Jim Davila reminds readers that while he is “still quite skeptical that the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife is an ancient artifact, King has made a real effort to keep the tone high and the skeptics should do the same.”
There have surely been other online articles written about the papyrus not mentioned in this article. I apologize to any esteemed commentators that I missed in this post, but it is hard to keep up with such a large discussion. In fact, the blog-based scholarly reactions to the HTR publication have been so varied and complex that they themselves have been analyzed as a prime example of new media in academic discussion (see Norwegian School of Theology’s Liv Ingeborg Lied’s post here).
We at Bible History Daily look forward to the continuing discussion online, as well as Hershel Shanks’s First Person in the January/February 2014 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
For more in Bible History Daily, see A “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” on a Coptic Papyrus and Hershel Shanks’s Is the Harvard Theological Review a Coward or Did Dr. Karen King Do Something Wrong?
We recommend readers examine Harvard’s Gospel of Jesus’ Wife website and the April 2014 issue of Harvard Theological Review.
What is Coptic? Who were the Copts in ancient Egypt? Leo Depuydt gives a short history in BAR >>
Related Posts
Must-Read Free eBooks
Want more Bible history?
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Unlock Unlimited Access to the Bible's Past
Unlock Unlimited Access to the Bible's Past
Become an All-Access Member to explore the Bible's rich history. Get Biblical Archaeology Review in print, full online access, and FREE online talks. Plus, enjoy special Travel/Study discounts. Don't miss out—begin your journey today!
All of this fuss over the authenticity of this fragment won’t matter to the general public since this is the stuff that movies are made out of, like that episode of the X-Files entitled “Hollywood A.D.” which also includes a “Gospel of Mary Magdalene.”
Lots of Apocryphal writings out there. Also millions of interpretations of Scripture! This is why Tradition is of the greatest importance. There has been no significant break in the Church theology until 1500 years AD. Also for consideration, is the fact that Jesus did in fact have a spouse, she is called the Church! He is the Bridegroom, and we are His bride!
I could not agree more with Steve’s comment, to which I can only add that movies have been some people’s only contact with things Biblical. And if you believe fantasy, and entertainment for money, it’s my opinion you’re leaving out the greatest detail…knowledge.
The Scripture is always telling us about the spiritual Kingdom of our Lord Jesus which is unseen and real. He is God who manifests among us in the spiritual realm.
“There has been no significant break in the Church theology until 1500 years AD.”
Yeah… well…early church fathers would not agree with RCC tradition, and most of them sticked to the scriptures as a final authority. But I agree that Jesus will come for his Bridegroom.
New discoveries and evidence concerning the life of Jesus—whether it be the “historical” Jesus” or the “Jesus of the gospels”—and his followers are ongoing, and the scholarly perception of who he was, and how the early Christian community saw him continues to evolve. One should not simply ignore or discount new discoveries and insights into the lives of Jesus and his followers. Rather we should examine whether or not new evidence changes our perception and understanding of him: as the Christ, as a man, and of his mission.
It will be interesting to see whether the validity of this particular papyrus fragment pans out or not. At minimum, the fragment has stimulated a dialogue on Jesus’ own life—as a man, and as a religious leader—as well as the views of the early Christian community on celibacy, sex, and marriage. If the fragment does turn out to be genuine, and researchers can point to other ancient documents to support the claim that Jesus was married as I myself believe, it will drastically change our perceptions of Jesus, his mission, and even the role of women in the early Christian community. In any case, we should never stop seeking the Truth. In his own words, Jesus tell us: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; keep knocking, and the door will be opened to you, for everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks the door will be opened.”
JB Richards
Author of “Miriamne the Magdala”- The First Chapter in the “Yeshua and Miri Novel Series” and Content Creator for The Miriamne Page
For more information on this novel series, and The Miriamne Page, just click on this link: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Miriamne-the-Magdala-First-in-the-Series-of-the-Yeshua-Miri-Novels/206903979347028
to think that a teacher or rabbi of Jesus time wise not married is Ni-eve to say the lest just be cos it does not fit to our way of thinking at 33 he would have had a wife family as most marriages were arranged sought to help the peoples family not to under mine his teaching he also had siblings common-sense tells of this
Many lies were told – ancient and new – about the life and death of Jesus.
Even in thr gospels we read about jews leaders conspiring againt the resurrection: “let us spread the word that his disciplrs came in the night and stole his body”.
Is it hard for them to write a lie concerning Jesus celibacy?
From this perspective, the papyrus is authentically ancient, but still a lie.
ANCIENT – AND – FALSE…
The scripture is misinterpreted
What difference does it make if Jesus was married or not? Does not change his teachings in any way. It would have made a difference if his teaching was celibacy. It was not. He taught us to love one another and love God. Jesus did all the human activities like eating, drinking, crying, laughing, wearing clothes and he even died so what if he was married? In the Bible there is no word for wife as such. The word for woman could be translated wife or simply woman. So what if he addressed a woman as ” My woman” that was a normal way those days to address a women.