Watch full-length lecture videos as dozens of top scholars discuss Exodus research at a 2014 UCSD conference
“The closest parallel to the Book of Exodus in the ancient West is Homer’s Odyssey. Both are stories of migration—of identity suspended until the protagonist—Odysseus or Israel—reaches a home. Neither account records events of the sort that are likely to have left marks in the archaeological record, or even in contemporaneous monuments… But the Exodus is not the story of an individual; it is the story of a nation. It is the historical myth of an entire people, a focal point for national identity.”
–Baruch Halpern, “The Exodus from Egypt: Myth or Reality?” The Rise of Ancient Israel, 1991.
The Exodus sits at the heart of Israelite religion, literature and identity, and aspects of the narrative helped shape traditions in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Yet challenging textual and archaeological evidence has led some scholars to question whether the Biblical narrative reflects a single historical event or if it should be read, as Ronald Hendel wrote in Bible Review, as “conflation of history and memory—a mixture of historical truth and fiction, composed of ‘authentic’ historical details, folklore motifs, ethnic self-fashioning, ideological claims and narrative imagination.”
An international conference hosted by Calit2’s Qualcomm Institute at UC San Diego addressed some of the most challenging issues in Exodus scholarship. According to the Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination website, the conference “brought together more than 40 of the world’s leading archaeologists, Biblical scholars, Egyptologists, historians and geo-scientists. In tandem, the Qualcomm Institute staged an exhibition, EX3: Exodus, Cyber-Archaeology and the Future … as an experiment in trans-disciplinary research, team science, and scholarly communication using technologies developed for the museum of the future.”
Watch the conference’s full-length lectures online for free on Bible History Daily, courtesy of conference host Thomas E. Levy, distinguished professor and Norma Kershaw Chair in the Archaeology of Ancient Israel and Neighboring Lands at UCSD. For more on research at UCSD, visit the Levantine and Cyber-Archaeology Lab.
Watch the opening remarks at the bottom of this page, and click on lecture titles in the list below to watch.
*Keynote Lecture* On the Historicity of the Exodus: What Egyptology Can Contribute Today in Assessing the Sojourn in Egypt. Manfred Bietak, director emeritus, Institute of Egyptology, University of Vienna. Keynote introduction: Thomas Schneider.
Out of Egypt: Did Israel’s Exodus Include Tales? Susan Hollis, State University of New York.
The Ark of the Covenant and Egyptian Sacred Barks: A Comparative Study. Scott Noegel, University of Washington (video unavailable).
Traditions Regarding a Great Going Forth from North-East Africa: Date and Reliability. Antoine Hirsch, Canadian Institute in Egypt on behalf of Donald Redford, Pennsylvania State University.
The ‘Image’ of the Pharaoh in Judahite and Israelite Society According to the Glyptic Evidence, Stefan Münger, University of Bern.
*Keynote Lecture* The Wilderness Itineraries: Who, How and When Did Biblical Authors Know About the Southern Deserts? Israel Finkelstein, Tel Aviv University.
Dates for the Exodus I Have Known, Lawrence T. Geraty, La Sierra University.
Egyptian Text Parallels to the Exodus: The Egyptology Literature, Brad C. Sparks, Archaeological Research Group.
Can Archaeological Correlates for the Mnemo-Narratives of Exodus Be Found? Aren Maeir, Bar-Ilan University.
The Emergence of Israel in Retrospect, Robert Mullins, Azusa Pacific University.
The Emergence of Iron Age Israel: The Question of “Origins,” Avraham Faust, Bar-Ilan University and Harvard University.
Har Karkom: Archaeological Discoveries on a Holy Mountain in the Desert of Exodus, Emmanuel Anati, University of Lecce.
Which Way Out of Egypt? Physical Geography Constraints on the Exodus Itinerary, Stephen Moshier, Wheaton College.
Egyptology, Egyptologists and the Exodus, James Hoffmeier, Trinity International University.
*Keynote Lecture* Exodus and Memory: Remembering the Origin of Israel and Monotheism, Jan Assmann, University of Konstanz.
The Exodus and the Bible: What Was Known, What Was Remembered, What Was Forgotten, William Dever, University of Arizona and Lycoming College.
The Exodus Based on the Sources Themselves, Richard Friedman, University of Georgia.
The Omerta on the Exodus, Baruch Halpern, University of Georgia.
The Exodus Account in Recent Pentateuchal Interpretation, Konrad Schmid, University of Zurich.
Sources of Judicial Power in the Moses Story, Stephen Russell, Princeton Theological Seminary.
Hero and Villain: Outline of the Exodus Pharaoh in Artapanus, Caterina Moro, University of Rome Sapienza.
Leaving Home: Jewish-Hellenistic Authors on the Exodus, Rene Bloch, University of Bern.
Exodus in the Quran, Babak Rahimi, University of California, San Diego.
From Liberation to Expulsion: The Exodus in the Earliest Jewish-Pagan Polemic, Pieter van der Horst, University of Utrecht (delivered in his absence by Kathleen Bennallack).
The Despoliation of Egypt: From Stealing Treasures to Saving Texts, Joel Allen, Dakota Wesleyan University.
In Search of Israel’s Insider Status: A Re-Evaluation of Israel’s Origins, Brendon Benz, William Jewell College.
What Was the Exodus? William Propp, University of California, San Diego.
*Keynote Lecture* The Exodus as Cultural Memory: Poetics, Politics, and the Past, Ronald Hendel, UC Berkeley.
Outside of Egypt: Joseph, Moses, and the Idea of Pastoralism Across Distance, Daniel Fleming, New York University (video unavailable).
Moses the Magician, Gary Rendsburg, Rutgers University.
The Revelation of the Divine Name to Moses, Thomas Römer, University of Lausanne.
The Exodus Narrative Between History and Literary Fiction, Christoph Berner, Universität Göttingen.
Mythic Dimensions of the Exodus Tradition, Bernard Batto, DePauw University.
Exodus and Exodus Traditions After the Linguistic Turn in History, Garrett Galvin, Fransciscan School of Theology and Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, and University of San Diego.
“The First Memory of Things”: Isaac Newton on Exodus and the Chronology of the Egyptian Empire, Mordechai Feingold, California Institute of Technology.
How Calculations Invaded the Deep Past, Jed Buchwald, California Institute of Technology.
Times of Darkness: Extreme Events, Long-Term Environmental Change, Mythology and History, John Grattan, Aberystwyth University.
Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Egypt Over the Periods Relevant to the Exodus Tradition, Michael Dee, University of Oxford (co-authors C. Bronk Ramsey, T. Higham).
The Thera Theories: Science and the Modern Reception History of the Exodus, Mark Harris, University of Edinburgh.
Exodus: A Geophysical Perspective, Steven Ward, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Inspired by a Tsunami? Computer Simulations of Potential (Tsunamigenic) Scenarios Related to the Exodus Narrative, Amos Salamon, Geological Survey of Israel (with co-authors S. Ward, F. McCoy, T. Levy).
EX3: Exodus, Cyber-Archaeology and the Future. Thomas E. Levy, UCSD.
Exodus Welcome and Introductions, Thomas Levy, Conference Chair; Jeff Elman, Dean, Division of Social Sciences, UCSD; Ramesh Rao, Director, Qualcomm Institute; Pradeep K. Khosla, Chancellor, UC San Diego
Welcome, Seth Lerer, Dean, Division of Arts + Humanities, UCSD
Out of Egypt Conference: Summation, Thomas Schneider, University of British Columbia.
Closing, Thomas Levy, University of California, San Diego.
Lecture videos courtesy of conference host Thomas E. Levy, distinguished professor and Norma Kershaw Chair in the Archaeology of Ancient Israel and Neighboring Lands at UCSD. All videos originally published on the Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination website, which features additional Exodus research and more information on the UCSD conference. For more on research at UCSD, visit the Levantine and Cyber-Archaeology Lab.
A version of this post originally appeared on BHD on March 11, 2014.
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access Membership. Get your print subscription to BAR and your online access to the BAS Library—as well as FREE online talks and Travel/Study discounts. Start your journey into the biblical past today!
Check out Night Signs by Aquilla Fleetwood.
Has none of the “experts” ever read “Ages in Chaos” by Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky?
Perhaps they keep silent about his great work so that they can cling on to their out-of-date ideas about the Exodus – and therefore all later Israelite history, They would have nothing left to speculate about!
Joe mentioned that the Exodus Pharaoh was the last of the Hyksos/Amalekites but the Hebrew Bible tells us clearly the as the Israelites were LEAVING Egypt (heading roughly east) the were attacked by the Amalekites heading WEST towards Egypt. The “Hyksos” (a descriptive name invented by the Greeks very many centuries after they entered Egypt after the devastation caused by the plagues and the destruction of Egypt’s army and king at the Sea of Reeds. Anyway we know from the Book of Samuel, the name of the last Amalakite pharoah and it was NOT the name Joe gave. Reasd alkl about it in “Ages in Chaos”.
Ummm, it seems no one has considered that the “Egyptians” from whom the Israelites fled were in fact the Hyksos. More specifically, the pharaoh of the Exodus narrative who was confronted by Aaron and Moses was Khamudi, the last of the Hyksos pharaohs. The devastation of the Hyksos army in the Sea of Reeds would have left the Lower Delta wide open to invasion by the Theban Ppharaoh Ahmose, but only after a few years had passed since the devastation of the Nine Plagues (the Tenth was exclusively for the Hyksos people), being cause by volcanic activity to the west (in the Tibesti Massif) would have affected the Egyptians as well. By the (more or less) standard Egyptian chronology the Israelite exodus from (Hyksos-controlled) Egypt would have occurred around 1550 BCE, certainly not a century before, nor a century (or more) after. That means the “experts” have gotten the Biblical exegesis/chronology all wrong. Oh well, maybe the next generation will finally get it right.
A minority position currently – but agreed!
[…] << Back to Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagin… […]
When “biblical” publications call the Exodus “a mixture of historical truth and fiction” composed of “historical details [and] folklore” and “historical myth”; we have “true lies!” May God deliver us from such! Will they next “help” explain the gospels and the life of Christ; will the resurrection then become an “historical myth”? If they believe the Exodus was an “historical myth,” what would that say about the Ten Commandments, which were given during the Exodus? They are using the good name of the Bible to attract believers but may they take the word Bible off their publications. Read EXODUS: The Route, Sea Crossing, God’s Mountain, this book deals with those “Who changed the truth of God into a lie…” http://www.amazon.com/EXODUS-G-M-Matheny-ebook/dp/B005DHNWXC/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=&qid=
[…] [12] Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/out-of-egypt-israels-exodus-between-… […]
[…] [12] Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/out-of-egypt-israels-exodus-between-… […]
[…] [12] Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/out-of-egypt-israels-exodus-between-… […]
[…] [12] Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/out-of-egypt-israels-exodus-between-… […]
please put subtitles in Spanish or translated
Hello, I am trying to contact Professor Bietak. Would you happen to have an email address for him? I am producing a curriculum for chldren and I would like to use his diagram of the Israelite style 4 room house and a photo of the Avaris dig site, it possible.
Do you know how I can get in touch with Professor Bietak? I would like permission to use his diagram of the Israelite 4-room house for a curriculum video I am producing.
[…] the lecture “Hero and Villain: outline of the Exodus Pharaoh in Artapanus” at the latest Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between text and memory, historical past and imagination convention hosted by way of Calit2’s Qualcomm Institute at UC San Diego. Watch the entire lecture […]
[…] full-length lectures from the Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between textual content and reminiscence, historical past and imagin… convention, which addressed one of the vital most difficult concerns in Exodus scholarship. The […]
Tomas Romer – The Divine Name
This man’s presuppositions lead to extraneous interpretations of Hosea 12 among other passages. Hosea 12 states Yahwah is related to Egypt? This is a (misguided) opinion stated as fact on his PowerPoint and in his lecture. What else is he presenting as fact that is should be opinion?
He cannot even pronounce the name of Yahwah correctly according to the historical manuscripts, using a modern Hebrew phonetic alphabet for an ancient name, and adding a Greek suffix “Yahvay.” Yet his lecture is on the name?
Shortened name forms:
Yah: Hallelujah –> Hallu Yah
Yaho: Benjamin Netanyaho (Jewish news media says it “Netanyao”)
Yaho: Iao (Greek Old Testament), Iaou (Clement of Alexandria)
Full name:
Yahoah/Yahwah: Ieoua (Philo of Byblos), Ioa (Severi of Antioch), Yah Wah (“History of the Native American Indians” by James Adair, 1775), Y’Wah (Karen tribe, Burma), …
Yah –> Yaho/Yao –> Yahoah/Yahwah
Elohim a name? Elohim means “judge” or “deity.” It was used interchangeably with Yahwah in the same time periods, not as a name but as a title. ????
Jehovah?
Shortened name forms:
Yah: Hallelujah –> Hallu Yah
Yaho: Benjamin Netanyaho (Jewish news media says it “Netanyao”)
Yaho: Iao (Greek Old Testament), Iaou (Clement of Alexandria)
Full name:
Yahoah/Yahwah: Ieoua (Philo of Byblos), Ioa (Severi of Antioch), Yah Wah (“History of the Native American Indians” by James Adair, 1775), Y’Wah (Karen tribe, Burma), …
Yah –> Yaho/Yao –> Yahoah/Yahwah
[…] San Diego academician William Propp delivered a harangue “What Was The Exodus?” during a new Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination discussion hosted by Calit2’s Qualcomm Institute during UC San Diego. Watch a full harangue video […]
[…] “The Exodus and a Bible: What Was Known, What Was Remembered, What Was Forgotten” during a new Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination discussion hosted by Calit2’s Qualcomm Institute during UC San Diego. Watch a full harangue video […]
[…] << Back to Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagin… […]
Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs) say as referenced by Kurt, “Because of the chaotic state of Egyptian chronology, it is not possible to determine with any certainty who this Pharaoh was.”
Let me say this. It is impossible for JWs to determine with any certainty or even a clue, who the Pharaoh of Moses was. That is because God goes no where near them. Spiritual cooties, you understand 😉 Just kidding ya, Kurt. But if you look for the circumstances that should point out the Pharaoh loud and clear, by the destruction of Pharaoh and his army, which certainly would have left Egypt devastated for some time, then you just might have your answer. I got it. Had it since 1987. One you have the Pharaoh, then you can straighten out the chronology problems indicated by the 1628 BC dendrochronology determination, rather than the much later approx 1500-1550 BC dates that come from Carbon 14 dating. the problem was a dark age in the 20th dynasty, after Rameses III. It leaves Egyptian time accounting missing as much as 150 years. I say about 140 years. That is why Rameses II and all before him should have dates pushed back a good 100-150 years. But unless you had a date of certainty somewhere in the 18th or 19th dynasty, you would be lost since the 2nd intermediate period between the 12th and 18th dynasties is a hopeless quagmire. I guts it all, though. Someday you’ll read about it.
What makes it evern tougher for JWs is that they do not have an accurate bible Chronology of their own. They contaminate it with their 1914 (Dan. 4: “7 times”) baloney. Here is the real deal:
http://www.truth1.org/chrono-over.htm
[…] Geography & Exodus […]
[…] harangue “Exodus and Memory: Remembering a Origin of Israel and Monotheism” during a new Out of Egypt: Israel’s Exodus Between Text and Memory, History and Imagination discussion hosted by Calit2’s Qualcomm Institute during UC San Diego. Watch a full harangue video […]
[…] Text Memory […]
An Issue Greater Than Deliverance
On commissioning Moses, Jehovah emphasized the importance of the divine name. Respect for that name and the One whom it represents was vital. When asked about his name, Jehovah told Moses: “I shall prove to be what I shall prove to be.” Further, Moses was to tell the sons of Israel: “Jehovah the God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.” Jehovah added: “This is my name to time indefinite, and this is the memorial of me to generation after generation.” (Exodus 3:13-15) Jehovah is still the name by which God is known to his servants around the earth.—Isaiah 12:4, 5; 43:10-12.
Appearing before Pharaoh, Moses and Aaron delivered their message in the name of Jehovah. But Pharaoh arrogantly said: “Who is Jehovah, so that I should obey his voice to send Israel away? I do not know Jehovah at all and, what is more, I am not going to send Israel away.” (Exodus 5:1, 2) Pharaoh proved to be both hardhearted and deceitful, yet Jehovah urged Moses to deliver messages to him again and again. (Exodus 7:14-16, 20-23; 8:1, 2, 20) Moses could see that Pharaoh was irritated. Would any good come from confronting him again? Israel was eager for deliverance. Pharaoh was adamant in his refusal. What would you have done?
Moses delivered yet another message, saying: “This is what Jehovah the God of the Hebrews has said: ‘Send my people away that they may serve me.’” God also said: “By now I could have thrust my hand out that I might strike you and your people with pestilence and that you might be effaced from the earth. But, in fact, for this cause I have kept you in existence, for the sake of showing you my power and in order to have my name declared in all the earth.” (Exodus 9:13-16) Because of what would be done with hardhearted Pharaoh, Jehovah purposed to demonstrate his power in a way that would serve notice on all who defy him. This would include Satan the Devil, the one whom Jesus Christ later called “the ruler of the world.” (John 14:30; Romans 9:17-24) As foretold, Jehovah’s name was declared around the earth. His long-suffering led to preservation for the Israelites and a vast mixed multitude that joined them in worshiping him. (Exodus 9:20, 21; 12:37, 38) Since then, the declaration of Jehovah’s name has benefited millions more who have taken up true worship.
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2005366#h=8:0-11:1072
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200272060
It is amazing how blind and confused the “experts” are when it comes to the Bible. They begin with assuming it is only an ordinary history. The Bible was dictated by God the those who wrote and has an amazing unity, harmony and continuity throuhout.
Much of it was written by eyewitnesses. They were there an wrote about others who were there. Parts of the Bible were revealed by God and kept true to real history by God’s guidance. It is not as Peter said “a cunninly devised fable” as the “experts” seem to say.
How do they know? Were they there? Do they have knowledge of events that they did not witness from some source better than God? Do they know all things. To imagine that they know better than the eye witnesses and God is extremely arrogant. Such arrogace is irrational and cannot even be considered to have any validity.
Trust God and His word The Bible.