BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

Bowling Green State University Explores Repatriation of Looted Mosaics

Bible and archaeology news

Bowling Green State University has quickly and candidly responded to accusations of owning looted mosaics from the Turkish site of Zeugma. The Turkish government requested that the mosaics be returned after Brown University’s Rebecca Molholt revealed that their claimed origin of Antioch was false. BGSU administrators were unaware of the original provenience of their artifacts when they purchased them from a dealer, who forged evidence suggesting that they came from Princeton University’s legal excavation in the 1930s. The mosaics likely come from the Roman garrison town at Zeugma, a site heavily looted in the 1960s, where subsequent excavations have produced stunning Roman-era mosaics.

The case is being handled amicably, and Turkey’s foreign ministry has praised Bowling Green’s response. Over the past decade, calls for repatriation have often morphed into litigious battles over finances and cultural heritage, but this case has prioritized the ethical presentation and treatment of artifacts.* The investigation on the original provenience of the mosaics is ongoing, and BGSU is exploring sensible solutions.

Bowling Green State University Explores Repatriate of Looted Mosaics

The contested Roman-era mosaics displayed at Bowling Green State University likely come from Zeugma, a site along the Euphrates in Turkey.

* See sidebars to “Egypt’s Chief Archaeologist Defends His Rights (and Wrongs)” Biblical Archaeology Review, May/June 2011, and “Archaeological Views: A Case Against the Repatriation of Archaeological Artifacts” Biblical Archaeology Review, May/June 2011.

Related Posts

Abydos Ramses II Offering Gifts to Gods
Mar 29
The Pharaohs’ Golden Parade

By: Jonathan Laden

et-tell
Feb 17
Where Is Biblical Bethsaida?

By: Samuel DeWitt Pfister

Roman Coin from Geva
Feb 11
Roman Coin Discovered on Mt. Carmel

By: Jonathan Laden

Purple-clad David anointed king by Samuel.
Jan 31
The Royal Purple of David and Solomon

By: Jonathan Laden


2 Responses

  1. cheapest beats by dre says:

    Definitely consider that that you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be at the web the easiest factor to take into accout of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed whilst folks consider concerns that they just do not understand about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thank you
    cheapest beats by dre http://www.religionandnature.com/beats/cheapest-beats-by-dre.html

  2. Patrimoine archéologique en danger | Insula says:

    […] proviennent probablement de Zeugma. Le site de zeugma avait été pillé dans les années 1960 (Bible History Daily du 3 mars 2012). Pour […]

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 Responses

  1. cheapest beats by dre says:

    Definitely consider that that you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be at the web the easiest factor to take into accout of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed whilst folks consider concerns that they just do not understand about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thank you
    cheapest beats by dre http://www.religionandnature.com/beats/cheapest-beats-by-dre.html

  2. Patrimoine archéologique en danger | Insula says:

    […] proviennent probablement de Zeugma. Le site de zeugma avait été pillé dans les années 1960 (Bible History Daily du 3 mars 2012). Pour […]

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Send this to a friend