Hezekiah’s religious reforms sought to centralize worship
A millennia-old latrine discovered at Tel Lachish in Israel might reveal some interesting insights into Biblical history. According to Sa’ar Ganor and Igor Kreimerman, who conducted the excavations on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA), the latrine could be evidence of King Hezekiah’s religious reforms enacted throughout the Kingdom of Judah in the eighth century B.C.E. The archaeologists detail their discovery in the article “Going to the Bathroom at Lachish” in the November/December 2017 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
The Hebrew Bible has several references to King Hezekiah’s reforms and attempts to centralize worship in Jerusalem. 2 Chronicles 29–32 describes his efforts during the first year of his reign to cleanse and refurbish the Temple in Jerusalem, believing that his ancestors had not worshipped the God of Israel dutifully. 2 Kings 18:4 narrates that “he removed the high places (bamot), broke down the pillars (masseboth), and cut down the sacred pole (asherah).”
Lachish, located in the foothills of Judah (the Shephelah), was regarded as the second most important city in the Kingdom of Judah after Jerusalem. Spanning more than 18 acres on the tell, the Iron Age city boasted a palace-fort, city wall and six-chambered gate complex—within which, Ganor and Kreimerman argue, may be an Israelite gate-shrine.
The excavations at Tel Lachish fully exposed the massive city gate complex, which measures about 80 feet by 80 feet. Discovered at the complex were remnants of storage jars—including some that bore the stamp lmlk (“[belonging] to the king”)—that may be evidence of Hezekiah’s preparations against Assyrian king Sennacherib’s impending attacks. Lachish was completely destroyed in 701 B.C.E.
Part of this gate complex, the archaeological team found, was a large room that appears to have been a shrine. The room contained two four-horned altars, whose horns had been intentionally damaged, and several ceramic lamps, bowls and stands. Ganor and Kreimerman believe that the destroyed altars corroborate Biblical references to King Hezekiah’s reforms: his efforts to centralize worship in Jerusalem and abolish it elsewhere (see 2 Kings 18:4).
Most surprising of all was that in one corner of the room, the archaeologists discovered a seat carved of stone with a hole in the center—what Ganor and Kreimerman believe to be a toilet. This latrine, Ganor and Kreimerman say, was unquestionably a form of desecration of this shrine room—a practice described in the Hebrew Bible: “Then they demolished the pillar of Baal, and destroyed the temple of Baal, and made it a latrine to this day” (2 Kings 10:27).
“This is the first time that an archaeological find confirms this phenomenon,” Ganor explained.
Learn more about Sa’ar Ganor and Igor Kreimerman’s interpretation of the gate-shrine at Lachish in the context of other known archaeological examples of King Hezekiah’s religious reforms by reading the full article “Going to the Bathroom at Lachish” in the November/December 2017 issue of BAR.
Not a BAS Library member yet? Join the BAS Library today.
This Bible History Daily feature was originally published on October 4, 2016. It has been updated and expanded.
Hezekiah’s Religious Reform—In the Bible and Archaeology by David Rafael Moulis
King Hezekiah in the Bible: Royal Seal of Hezekiah Comes to Light
Lachish: Open Access to BAR Articles on Lachish Archaeology
Which Altar Was the Right One in Ancient Israelite Religion?
Which finds made our top 10 Biblical archaeology discoveries of 2016? Find out >>
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access membership. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today!Subscribe Today
It is not any ancient latrine, it is an ancient table for libation. There are many coeect analogies to this construction in the rock art on different territories begining from the Neolithic. They consist of a shallow round pit with a groove from its edge and outside carved on horizontal surfaces of rocks. For exemples, see ‘cupmarks rock art’ in every internet portal. Archeologists argue that such reliefs were used for libations in sacred places – shrines. Not to …
I wonder who was the last to sit on it. 🙂
It”s BC, not BCE.
There is so much to learn from historical sites, but so much must be guessed too. Why? Because the people who constructed and used this stuff aren’t around. So we must use our imaginations and all evidence to conclude an answer.
Jesus’ followers aren’t around either. They were the closest to Jesus and knew Him the best. So how do we learn what they knew?by reading their statements in the Bible. The Bible is completely filled with first-hand witness accounts of biblical times and events.
Read your Bible, it’s great for the soul.
.It says the latrine was symbolic and never used. Maybe it had a chamber under it and a pot to carry the waste out to keep from stinking up the place
Why can’t ppl just open their eyes? A latrine never used means more things? For example,
“it might never have been a latrine?”
“We might have the right discovery but wrong conclusion?”
Stop believing like its the truth.
The Bible is the truth! And it is a great history book too!!
These discoveries just confirm that the Bible really is Gods word and not man’s (proverbs 4:18).
And the passage was not talking about Lachish…the point is that this was a practice.
To Nelson – read it again. The Scripture doesn’t say it was used, only that it was “made a latrine.”
But there is a slight inconsistency: the passage from 2 Kings states that people used the room as a latrine, whereas the field tests apparently indicate otherwise. I’m biased in favor of trusting the reliability of scripture, so I suggest the archaeological team test other locations in the room to examine the possibility that the stone toilet had been moved, or that it was not the only location used for the desecration.
So, is “the bible myth”, or as far back as we can analyze, do we find “real names,real places, real dates”?
Wow! Archaeology confirms a Bible passage to be true.