Principles, Practices, and Pitfalls
The New Testament that we read today in many different translations is not based on one single manuscript of the original Greek text. Why? There simply is no such thing as a complete text of the New Testament that we could date to the apostolic times, or even two or three centuries after the last of the apostles. Extant manuscripts containing the entire Christian Bible are the work of medieval monks. The modern scholarly editions of the original Greek text draw on readings from many different ancient manuscripts. As a result, the New Testament presented in any of our Bibles does not correspond to a single, authoritative ancient manuscript.
The oldest surviving examples of the New Testament come to us, instead, as fragments and scraps of papyrus excavated (mostly) in Egypt. How old are the oldest of these biblical fragments, and why does it matter whether they were written in the first or the fourth century? “Sometimes it’s a big deal,” states Brent Nongbri of the Norwegian School of Theology, Religion, and Society in Oslo. Expert on early Christian manuscripts, Professor Nongbri offers insights into the critical issues of dating ancient biblical manuscripts in his article “How Old Are the Oldest Christian Manuscripts?” published in the Summer 2020 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
Although the New Testament as we know it is essentially a “collage” of various surviving manuscripts, it relies heavily on one particular, parchment manuscript—the fourth-century Codex Vaticanus, or the Vatican Codex. In the mid-20th century, explains Nongbri, “most New Testament textual critics believed that the text of the New Testament preserved in the Codex Vaticanus was the result of an editorial revision that took place in the fourth century. Then in 1961, a papyrus codex containing the Gospels of Luke and John in Greek (P.Bodmer XIV–XV or P75 to specialists) was published. It is often called the most important New Testament papyrus so far discovered because it was dated, on the basis of its handwriting, to about A.D. 175–225, and its text agrees very closely with that of Codex Vaticanus.”
This discovery led many to argue that the text of the Vatican Codex must, too, have originated as early as the late second century and was then transmitted carefully (without corruption) until it was written down in the Vatican Codex, in the fourth century. This sounds logical, but there is one substantial flaw in such an argument—it is based on nothing but the supposed date of the Bodmer papyrus that has been established (or, shall we say, “guessed”) by comparing the handwriting with other extant manuscripts. Palaeography, which is what the comparative study of handwriting is called, is just one of the possible ways to date ancient manuscripts, including the earliest examples of the Christian Bible.To explore the uses, abuses, and caveats of the dating techniques, read “How Old Are the Oldest Christian Manuscripts?” published in the Summer 2020 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.
This post first appeared in Bible History Daily in June, 2020
Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.
How the Books of the New Testament Were Chosen
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access Membership. Get your print subscription to BAR and your online access to the BAS Library—as well as FREE online talks and Travel/Study discounts. Start your journey into the biblical past today!
I completed master of theology but never learned much about oldest New Testament papers. Thank you for your research and article! I am now suspecting that the Vatican (well, Romans) crafted the New Testament. Didn’t they crucify Paul? As we know, history mainly is written by the victors (who make stories to suit them). Logic says the Roman Christians raising from Constantine (maybe earlier) may well have framed Jesus’s death so positively to cover their own guilt in the matter. How convenient that they happened to be the catalyst for God’s plan to crucify Jesus. Fact is that God stormed and sent downpours at His death….God was not happy. I like your article. Thank you.
You should consider article: https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/how-the-books-of-the-new-testament-were-chosen/. This shows how many early scholars of the primitive church, well before constantine, and by years in the hundreds, discuss, comment on subjects coming from existing gospels and paul writings of their times. This widely sparse geographic communication exposes that non coercion was possible. The content was already there, early scolars discussing on their views of the content. This invalidates any presumption about New Testament content being decided in the years Constantine made christianity the official religion of the empire.
Three interesting things here:
1 codex Sinaiticus, paleographically dated to the 4th century, (https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/codex/date.aspx) isn’t mentioned.
2 Although the article claims “the entire Christian Bible are the work of medieval monks.” Neither the Codex Vaticanus nor the codex Sinaiticus date to medieval times (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/medieval follow through to the middle ages definition has that time period being from the 6th to 16th centuries).
3 Could the Dura-Europos fragment shown here be from the Diatessaron?
Thanks for the interesting read!