SEARCH
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE
 | 
RENEW
 | 
DONATE

BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

What Does the Bible Say About Tattoos?

Taboo tattoos

open-torah-pointer

Torah Scroll. What is said about tattoos in the Bible? Leviticus, the third book of the Hebrew Bible, prohibits them without giving an explicit reason. Why does the Bible prohibit tattoos? Photo: “Open Torah and Pointer” by Lawrie Cate is licensed under CC-by-SA-2.0.

What does the Bible say about tattoos?

Leviticus 19:28 says, “You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the LORD.” Although this passage clearly prohibits tattoos, it does not give an explicit reason why. This begs the question: Why does the Bible prohibit tattoos?

In his Biblical Views column “Unholy Ink: What Does the Bible Say about Tattoos?” Mark W. Chavalas, Professor of History at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, examines the taboo on tattoos in the Bible. Not only does he analyze traditional explanations for this prohibition, but he also investigates what tattoos signified to ancient Near Eastern peoples, including the ancient Israelites, which suggests the real reason why tattoos were taboo.

Leviticus 19 denounces idolatry and several pagan mourning practices. Some have thought that because of the proximity of the taboo on tattoos to the prohibition of other pagan mourning practices in Leviticus, tattooing must have been a pagan mourning practice. However, we find no evidence of this in ancient texts from the Levant, Mesopotamia or Egypt. As far as we can tell, tattooing was not an ancient mourning practice in these cultures.


 

This is not to give the impression that tattooing never appears in ancient Near Eastern texts; it does—just not as a mourning practice. In the ancient Near East, tattoos were used to mark slaves. Often the name of a slave’s owner would be tattooed or branded on his hand or forehead. If then the slave were to run away, he could be easily returned to his master. Thus, tattooing was seen as a sign of ownership.

Chavalas thinks that this might be behind the taboo on tattoos in the Bible:

“Tattooing, an insignia of ownership, was perhaps condemned in Leviticus because it reminded them [the Israelites] of their past. After all, they had just spent the last four centuries as slaves in Egypt, where tattooing was also used as a sign of slavery. No longer considered slaves, the Israelites now were prohibited to mark their bodies with permanent signs of servitude to former masters. This did not have to be explicitly articled to them; no one need ask prison inmates why they shed their orange jumpsuits when they are no longer incarcerated.”

Chavalas also notes that there might be a positive reference to tattoos in the Bible. Isaiah 44:5 reads:

This one will say, “I am the LORD’s,”
another will be called by the name of Jacob,
yet another will write on the hand, “The LORD’s,”
and adopt the name of Israel.

By writing God’s name on his hand, the Israelite in Isaiah 44:5 “was willingly proposing to become a servant of God.” At least in this case, it seems that tattooing was acceptable because the person was marking himself as belonging to the God of Israel.

To learn more about tattoos in the Bible, read Mark Chavalas’s full column “Unholy Ink: What Does the Bible Say about Tattoos?” in the November/December 2016 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.


Subscribers: Read the full Biblical Views column “Unholy Ink: What Does the Bible Say about Tattoos?” by Mark Chavalas in the November/December 2016 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.

Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.


This Bible History Daily feature was originally published on October 31, 2016.


Related reading in Bible History Daily

Love Your Neighbor: Only Israelites or Everyone?

Book of Leviticus Verses Recovered from Burnt Hebrew Bible Scroll

The Exodus: Fact or Fiction?

Related Posts

May 19
Who Is Balaam Son of Beor? Part One

By: Nathan Steinmeyer

Figurine in darkness, with black background and shadow on the body of the fragmentary figurine, which depicted a man's chest with an open robe. Courtesy Israel Antiquities Authority
May 15
Child Finds Roman-Era Figurine in the Negev

By: Lauren K. McCormick

4 multispectral photos of the same potsherd with red ink writing
May 11
News in the History of the Alphabet

By: Lauren K. McCormick

Aerial shot of city walls with shamash gate. all the tan color of sand. Courtesy Timothy Harrison et al., “The Shamash Gate, Nineveh: A Window into Two Episodes of Instability,” Iraq (2026), CC-BY 4.0
May 8
Archaeologists Begin Restoring Shamash Gate

By: Lauren K. McCormick


37 Responses:

  1. sandy says:

    doesn’t Leviticus talk about not wearing mixed blends of fabric for clothing. then we are all in trouble

  2. Patrick Tilton says:

    Ought there not be a difference recognized between an adult seeking to adorn their body with art inked into their own skin, and branding marks forced on someone — such as the numbers forced onto the arms of Jews in the concentration camps? Does the Bible condemn the use of make-up by women to make themselves more attractive and photogenic? What about newscasters, who would look atrocious if not for make-up (like in the Tim Burton ‘BATMAN’ movie, when the Joker poisoned make-up products, forcing the newscasters to appear on TV without make-up) — including the make-ups worn by televangelists? What about actors wearing elaborate make-ups, such as the latex foam appliances worn by Roddy McDowall (et al.) in PLANET OF THE APES — wouldn’t THAT be just as egregious a ‘sin’ as tattooing oneself?
    This same book — or, anthology of books in the canon — claims that God answered Joshua’s imperative ‘prayer’ that the Sun and Moon cease moving across the sky for “about a day” . . . and nobody in their right mind believes that this biblical miracle actually happened in history — so why should anybody living in the 21st Century make a fuss about this taboo which has nothing to do with treating your fellow human beings with respect? As for ‘God’, well, He ought to care more about the well-meaning heart of us wretched slobs trying to get along with our neighbors — you know, the Golden Rule — than such innocuous activities engaged in by consenting adults who aren’t harming anybody else.

    1. Smart enough to see through you says:

      You presume to tell G-d how to judge!?
      Fool.

  3. Krizzy says:

    However, tattooing was forbidden in the ancient Middle East by the authors of the Hebrew Bible. According to Leviticus 19:28, “you shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves.” This is also why, rather than having a permanent mark on my skin, I exclusively use temporary tatatoos from https://wannabeink.com/collections/christian.

  4. neet and angel says:

    Interesting read! I’ve always wondered about the Bible’s take on tattoos. It’s eye-opening to see how the ancient Israelites weren’t allowed to get tattoos, and yet, tattoos are becoming more acceptable in modern Christian culture. I’m curious to see how this topic continues to be addressed in the Church.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


37 Responses:

  1. sandy says:

    doesn’t Leviticus talk about not wearing mixed blends of fabric for clothing. then we are all in trouble

  2. Patrick Tilton says:

    Ought there not be a difference recognized between an adult seeking to adorn their body with art inked into their own skin, and branding marks forced on someone — such as the numbers forced onto the arms of Jews in the concentration camps? Does the Bible condemn the use of make-up by women to make themselves more attractive and photogenic? What about newscasters, who would look atrocious if not for make-up (like in the Tim Burton ‘BATMAN’ movie, when the Joker poisoned make-up products, forcing the newscasters to appear on TV without make-up) — including the make-ups worn by televangelists? What about actors wearing elaborate make-ups, such as the latex foam appliances worn by Roddy McDowall (et al.) in PLANET OF THE APES — wouldn’t THAT be just as egregious a ‘sin’ as tattooing oneself?
    This same book — or, anthology of books in the canon — claims that God answered Joshua’s imperative ‘prayer’ that the Sun and Moon cease moving across the sky for “about a day” . . . and nobody in their right mind believes that this biblical miracle actually happened in history — so why should anybody living in the 21st Century make a fuss about this taboo which has nothing to do with treating your fellow human beings with respect? As for ‘God’, well, He ought to care more about the well-meaning heart of us wretched slobs trying to get along with our neighbors — you know, the Golden Rule — than such innocuous activities engaged in by consenting adults who aren’t harming anybody else.

    1. Smart enough to see through you says:

      You presume to tell G-d how to judge!?
      Fool.

  3. Krizzy says:

    However, tattooing was forbidden in the ancient Middle East by the authors of the Hebrew Bible. According to Leviticus 19:28, “you shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves.” This is also why, rather than having a permanent mark on my skin, I exclusively use temporary tatatoos from https://wannabeink.com/collections/christian.

  4. neet and angel says:

    Interesting read! I’ve always wondered about the Bible’s take on tattoos. It’s eye-opening to see how the ancient Israelites weren’t allowed to get tattoos, and yet, tattoos are becoming more acceptable in modern Christian culture. I’m curious to see how this topic continues to be addressed in the Church.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Send this to a friend