SEARCH
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE
 | 
RENEW
 | 
DONATE

BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

Has the Childhood Home of Jesus Been Found?

Jesus’ home in Nazareth

The Sisters of Nazareth Convent by Ken Dark

The Sisters of Nazareth Convent
A Roman-period, Byzantine, and Crusader site in central Nazareth

Ken Dark
ISBN 9780367542191
Published September 16, 2020 by Routledge
284 Pages 18 Color & 147 B/W Illustrations


The childhood home of Jesus may have been found underneath the Sisters of Nazareth Convent in Nazareth, Israel, according to archaeologist Ken Dark.

Photo of the possible childhood home of Jesus in Nazareth

This very well could be the childhood home of Jesus. It doesn’t look inviting, but this rock-hewn courtyard house was quite likely Jesus’ home in Nazareth. The recent excavation by Ken Dark and the Nazareth Archaeological Project revealed good evidence to suggest this is where Jesus was raised. Photo: Ken Dark.

The excavation site located beneath the convent has been known since 1880, but it was never professionally excavated until the Nazareth Archaeological Project began its work in 2006. In Has Jesus’ Nazareth House Been Found? in the March/April 2015 issue of BAR, Ken Dark, the director of the Nazareth Archaeological Project, not only describes the remains of the home itself, but explores the evidence that suggests that this is the place where Jesus spent his formative years—or at least the place regarded in the Byzantine period as the childhood home of Jesus.

The excavation revealed a first-century “courtyard house” that was partially hewn from naturally occurring rock and partially constructed with rock-built walls. Many of the home’s original features are still intact, including doors and windows. Also found at the site were tombs, a cistern and, later, a Byzantine church.


Is it possible to identify the first-century man named Jesus behind the many stories and traditions about him that developed over 2,000 years in the Gospels and church teachings? Visit the Jesus/Historical Jesus study page to read free articles on Jesus in Bible History Daily.


The remains combined with the description found in the seventh-century pilgrim account De Locus Sanctis point to the courtyard house found beneath the convent as what may have been regarded as Jesus’ home in Nazareth. Archaeological and geographical evidence from the Church of the Annunciation, the International Marion Center and Mary’s Well come together to suggest that this location may be where Jesus transitioned from boy to man.

Ken Dark also discusses the relationship between the childhood home of Jesus, Nazareth and the important site of Sepphoris. It has been thought that Sepphoris would have provided Joseph with work and Jesus many important cultural experiences. However, Ken Dark believes that Nazareth was a larger town than traditionally understood and was particularly Jewish in its identity—as opposed to the Roman-influenced Sepphoris. This is partially based on the result of his survey of the Nahal Zippori region that separates Sepphoris and Nazareth geographically.

For more on the childhood home of Jesus, read the full article Has Jesus’ Nazareth House Been Found? by Ken Dark in the March/April 2015 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.


The Sisters of Nazareth Convent by Ken Dark

The Sisters of Nazareth Convent
A Roman-period, Byzantine, and Crusader site in central Nazareth

Ken Dark
ISBN 9780367542191
Published September 16, 2020 by Routledge
284 Pages 18 Color & 147 B/W Illustrations


Read the full article Has Jesus’ Nazareth House Been Found? by Ken Dark in the March/April 2015 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.

Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.


A version of this Bible History Daily article was originally published in March 2015.


Related reading in Bible History Daily

Has the Tomb of Jesus Been Discovered?

Was Jesus a Jew?

Sepphoris Inscriptions Reference Rabbis

All-Access members, read more in the BAS Library

O Little Town of…Nazareth?

Biblical Views: Jesus’ Birthplace and Jesus’ Home

Yes, They Are

How Jewish Was Sepphoris in Jesus’ Time?

Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.


Related Posts

Woodcut from Die Bibel in Bildern (1860) by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld.
Mar 10
Jesus Was a Refugee

By: Joan E. Taylor

Azekah excavation at sunrise. Photo by Efrat Shffi, Courtesy Lautenschläger Azekah Expedition
Feb 25
More Than Meets the Trowel

By: Nathan Steinmeyer

Feb 24
Ancient Pergamon

By: Sarah Yeomans


40 Responses:

  1. Krzysztof says:

    Maybe. Hm, at least Jesus from Nazareth (Mark 1:9)or not (why was he called “from Nazareth”) was for sure a Galilean (John 7: 41, 52) who was born with the “rebellion with the mother’s blood” (Josephus on Galileans)

  2. Robin says:

    For Ilan, Christina, Krystof….etc……a Jesus Slept Here sign would do no good. The name was too common for that era. Thus the need for “Jesus OF Nazareth” to distinguish Him from Jesus of Podunk…….But finding remains of dwelling sites, early church sites, olive presses. and other items from first-century A.D era suits as well. As for “every dive” having been named by Josephus, I think Ilan overstates a bit. The town of Nazareth was known up to Roman times when some resettlement occurred in the area…..and these other items — olive presses would be a sign of industry — show the area had settlement including the houses, the well site, etc…..As for “Jesus of Nazareth” — whether of or from, either way. And yes, Krystof, He was Galilean…….

  3. David says:

    All of the Bible quoting proves nothing; the odds of this house belonging to a particular person are exceedingly small.
    As well as, since it was cut out of rock, a wealthy family owned it, and my impression is that this was not a wealthy family, or we wouldn’t have the Bethlehem story. If Joseph were rich, he wouldn’t have had any problem finding a room and midwife.
    As to Mary being a virgin all her life, that sounds to me like something the RCC came up with to make people believe in her eternal purity. But it would not have been normative for that day. People would have looked askance if she had no further children.

    1. Flynt Favor says:

      Have you ever read the Bible?

  4. Andrew says:

    It’s hard to find the home of a fictional character. What’s next, the home of Harry Potter?

    1. Doug says:

      another clueless post

  5. Robert Frederick says:

    As Jesus was presumably an adolescent living in this abode, perhaps archeologists or better yet, biologists, might endeavour to uncover traces of semen in it. Being human, he would most assuredly have masturbated a few times a day as lads still do these days. Unless, of course, there was no chance of privacy as well as a severe repudiation back then of the habit. (Think outside of the box, I always tell myself.)

    1. Flynt Favor says:

      Are you simply projecting? Jesus was tempted with sin but did not engage in sin. This residence is not needed to confirm his existence. The possibility is as real as any historic dwelling or castle being a certain person’s home.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


40 Responses:

  1. Krzysztof says:

    Maybe. Hm, at least Jesus from Nazareth (Mark 1:9)or not (why was he called “from Nazareth”) was for sure a Galilean (John 7: 41, 52) who was born with the “rebellion with the mother’s blood” (Josephus on Galileans)

  2. Robin says:

    For Ilan, Christina, Krystof….etc……a Jesus Slept Here sign would do no good. The name was too common for that era. Thus the need for “Jesus OF Nazareth” to distinguish Him from Jesus of Podunk…….But finding remains of dwelling sites, early church sites, olive presses. and other items from first-century A.D era suits as well. As for “every dive” having been named by Josephus, I think Ilan overstates a bit. The town of Nazareth was known up to Roman times when some resettlement occurred in the area…..and these other items — olive presses would be a sign of industry — show the area had settlement including the houses, the well site, etc…..As for “Jesus of Nazareth” — whether of or from, either way. And yes, Krystof, He was Galilean…….

  3. David says:

    All of the Bible quoting proves nothing; the odds of this house belonging to a particular person are exceedingly small.
    As well as, since it was cut out of rock, a wealthy family owned it, and my impression is that this was not a wealthy family, or we wouldn’t have the Bethlehem story. If Joseph were rich, he wouldn’t have had any problem finding a room and midwife.
    As to Mary being a virgin all her life, that sounds to me like something the RCC came up with to make people believe in her eternal purity. But it would not have been normative for that day. People would have looked askance if she had no further children.

    1. Flynt Favor says:

      Have you ever read the Bible?

  4. Andrew says:

    It’s hard to find the home of a fictional character. What’s next, the home of Harry Potter?

    1. Doug says:

      another clueless post

  5. Robert Frederick says:

    As Jesus was presumably an adolescent living in this abode, perhaps archeologists or better yet, biologists, might endeavour to uncover traces of semen in it. Being human, he would most assuredly have masturbated a few times a day as lads still do these days. Unless, of course, there was no chance of privacy as well as a severe repudiation back then of the habit. (Think outside of the box, I always tell myself.)

    1. Flynt Favor says:

      Are you simply projecting? Jesus was tempted with sin but did not engage in sin. This residence is not needed to confirm his existence. The possibility is as real as any historic dwelling or castle being a certain person’s home.

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sign up for Bible History Daily
to get updates!
Send this to a friend