The story of the death of King Saul as told by archaeology and the Bible
The most famous episode featuring Beth Shean in the Bible follows the death of King Saul on Mt. Gilboa:
The Philistines came to strip the slain, and they found Saul and his three sons lying on Mt. Gilboa. They cut off his head and stripped him of his armor … They placed his armor in the temple of Ashtaroth, and they impaled his body on the wall of Beth Shean. When the men of Jabesh-Gilead heard about it—what the Philistines had done to Saul—all their stalwart men set out and marched all night. They removed the bodies of Saul and his sons from the wall of Beth Shean and came to Jabesh and burned them there. Then they took the bones and buried them under the tamarisk tree in Jabesh, and they fasted for seven days (1 Samuel 31:8–13; cf. 1 Chronicles 10:8–12).
Archaeology seeks to uncover an even broader picture of a site’s past. In the Bible, Beth Shean is a major administrative center in Solomon’s kingdom, but excavations show that the site was an important one long before (and after) the kings of Israel reigned over it. Even so, can archaeology and the Bible corroborate the same historical event?
Multiple excavations at Beth Shean in the past century have revealed a 6,000-year history of settlement at the site. Located near the intersection of two well-traveled ancient routes, Beth Shean proved to have important strategic value as early as the fifth millennium B.C.E., when it was first settled. Civilizations rose and fell at the site throughout the Chalcolithic period and Bronze Age. Some of the most impressive finds at Beth Shean came from the Late Bronze Age, when Egyptian pharaohs ruled over much of Canaan and used Beth Shean as a crucial administrative center to rule over its vassal kingdoms.
Unfortunately, due in part to later Roman and Byzantine construction at the base of the mound, excavators have not yet revealed any portion of the Beth Shean city wall from the 11th century B.C.E., when the Biblical story about King Saul’s death most likely occurred. And although the city was certainly occupied at this time, there is no evidence of a Philistine presence at the site then. So archaeology has not confirmed the Bible’s stories, but it has shed light on an even richer past at Beth Shean.
For more about the death of King Saul and the aftermath at Beth Shean in the Bible, as well as the extent to which archaeology and the Bible agree about Beth Shean’s past, read “Was King Saul Impaled on the Wall of Beth Shean?” by Amihai Mazar in Biblical Archaeology Review, March/April 2012.
Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.
This Bible History Daily feature was originally published on February 23, 2012.
Heavy Rains Reveal Limestone Funerary Busts Near Beth Shean, Israel
Glorious Beth-Shean: Huge new excavation uncovers the largest and best-preserved Roman/Byzantine city in Israel
Was King Saul Impaled on the Wall of Beth Shean?
Searching For Saul: What we really know about Israel’s first king
King Saul—A Bungler from the Beginning
Not a BAS Library or All-Access Member yet? Join today.
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access Membership. Get your print subscription to BAR and your online access to the BAS Library—as well as FREE online talks and Travel/Study discounts. Start your journey into the biblical past today!
Dear editor:
After years of study about the death of King Saul in Mt. Gilboa, I am convinced that it has nothing to do with the Philistines. There is no archaeological evidence that Philistines operated above the Yarkon River.
Very good
I take it they cut off Sauls head as a kind of jab at the Israelites for the death of Goliath whose head was cut off. I probably would have been more humiliating to leave Saul his head so Philistine passerby could mock and scorn.
My question is where was David in all this. He surely could have snuck up behind the Philistine army with his large contingent and mounted a rear flank attack and try to help the one he called the “annointed one of God” in his severest trial. In fact it might have boosted morale umpteen points.
Or was he hoping for exactly this turnout and his poem was more about Jonathan the King who was now out of his way in a bid for the throne?
——- “Beth Shean proved to have important strategic value as early as the fifth millennium B.C.E., when it was first settled.” — If you use BCE (Before Common Era) you are denying Christ and removing Him from history! This is shameful and wrong on a site about Bible matters – you ought to be well aware of this.
Good Grief! There are SEVERAL calendars/dating systems in the world: Judaic, Moslem, Indian, Chinese, European, even one for these United States. Due to Christianity becoming the dominant religion in Europe and later European-colonized Americas, the calendar in GENERAL use by these areas became a de facto “universal” calendar. But, because there are billions of users who do not belong to Christianity, using the “Before Christ” and even more nonsensical LATIN “Anno Domini” was a problem. The universal calendar being based on Dionysius Exiguus’ calculations, it was easier to come up with non-religious terms for SECULAR use rather then change calendar systems. So because “common” is a synonym for “universal”, using “Common Era” as a sub for “AD” and “Before (the) Common Era” as a sub for “BC” makes common sense. Also for Christians, CE can be read as “Christian Era” and BCE as “Before (the) Christian Era” making this a win-win. Personally, I’d prefer that 2023 be referred to as the year 247 using the calendar of these United States, but I’ll accept the use of Dennis Little’s 2023 (at least he had the right first name!).
SAUL
[Asked [of God]; Inquired [of God]].
1. A Benjamite descended from Jeiel (presumably also called Abiel) through Ner and Kish (1Ch 8:29-33; 9:35-39; see ABIEL No. 1); the first divinely selected king of Israel. (1Sa 9:15, 16; 10:1) Saul came from a wealthy family. A handsome man, standing head and shoulders taller than all others of his nation, he possessed great physical strength and agility. (1Sa 9:1, 2; 2Sa 1:23) The name of his wife was Ahinoam. Saul fathered at least seven sons, Jonathan, Ishvi, Malchi-shua, Abinadab, Ish-bosheth (Eshbaal), Armoni, and Mephibosheth, as well as two daughters, Merab and Michal. Abner, evidently King Saul’s uncle (see ABNER), served as chief of the Israelite army.—1Sa 14:49, 50; 2Sa 2:8; 21:8; 1Ch 8:33.
The young man Saul lived during a turbulent time of Israel’s history. Philistine oppression had reduced the nation to a helpless state militarily (1Sa 9:16; 13:19, 20), and the Ammonites under King Nahash threatened aggression. (1Sa 12:12) Whereas Samuel had faithfully judged Israel, his sons were perverters of justice. (1Sa 8:1-3) Viewing the situation from a human standpoint and, therefore, losing sight of Jehovah’s ability to protect his people, the older men of Israel approached Samuel with the request that he appoint a king over them.—1Sa 8:4, 5.
Anointed as King. Thereafter Jehovah guided matters to provide the occasion for anointing Saul as king.
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200003847
[…] Beth Shean Professor Amihai Mazar’s profile (Institute of Archaeology, accessed April 2012) Beth Shean in the Bible and Archaeology (Biblical Archaeology Society, accessed April 2012) Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the […]