BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

Urartu’s Inscribed Bronze Bowls

Scratching the surface of the Urartian language

A new study published in the journal Antiquity investigates more than 100 bronze bowls from the ancient kingdom of Urartu (biblical Ararat), which are now held in museums across Armenia, Russia, and elsewhere. The bowls bear royal inscriptions, which the authors analyze for content, engraving method, the paleography of the Urartian script (how it changed over time), and the construction of Urartian royal authority. The scholars offer new insights into a civilization whose writing culture is only partially understood.

The ancient kingdom of Urartu flourished in the highlands in what is now eastern Turkey, Armenia, and northwestern Iran, between the ninth and seventh centuries BCE. It was one of the great powers of the ancient Near East and one of the few states capable of challenging Assyria. Urartu built impressive fortresses, engineered sophisticated irrigation systems, and left behind monumental inscriptions carved into cliffs and stone stelae. In the Bible, Ararat is remembered as the mountain land where Noah’s Ark came to rest and as a powerful northern kingdom that challenged the empires of the ancient Near East.

Yet, despite its importance, historians know far less about Urartu than they do about Assyria or Babylonia. One reason is that comparatively few written records have survived. Most surviving Urartian texts are short, formulaic royal inscriptions commemorating kings, military campaigns, religious dedications, or building projects. The bronze bowls, on the other hand, are luxury objects associated with Urartian kings and elites.

Perhaps the study’s greatest contribution is showing that the bowls preserve a gradual evolution of Urartian cuneiform. The earliest Urartian inscriptions resemble Neo-Assyrian cuneiform. However, over successive reigns, the shape, proportions, and arrangement of the signs became increasingly standardized and recognizably Urartian. By comparing inscriptions that can be securely dated to different kings, the authors trace this process of development.

The authors also compare the form of individual cuneiform signs across dozens of bowls to examine the physical traces left by engraving. High-resolution photography and direct examination reveal differences in the angle, depth, and sequence of cuts used to produce the inscriptions. Engraving cuneiform into bronze required different methods than carving stone or impressing clay tablets. Urartu’s writing system seems shaped not only by language but also by the practical demands of working with metal.

Urartu was not the only ancient Near Eastern culture to inscribe luxury metal objects, but its surviving bronze bowls form an unusually rich archive. For example, at the fortress of Karmir-blur, nearly 100 inscribed bowls were found together, allowing the authors to compare examples from different reigns within a single archaeological context.

The consistency of inscriptions across the bowls suggests that engravers followed shared conventions rather than creating each inscription independently. Similar decorative arrangements and lettering styles imply that the makers worked within an established tradition, even though almost no evidence for Urartian workshops or scribal schools survives. In other words, the bowls provide indirect evidence for the institutions that supported royal writing.

Finally, the inscriptions on the bowls are combined with royal symbols such as lions and temple imagery, transforming them into political objects that communicated the king’s authority and legitimacy. The inscriptions identified the ruler, while the decoration reinforced connections between the monarchy, religion, and state power.

By analyzing the writing, craftsmanship, and imagery on the bowls, the scholars chip away at how Urartian writing developed, how its workshops operated, and how its political authority was expressed. It seems that not all of Urartu’s history is carved in stone.

---

Lauren K. McCormick is an assistant editor at Biblical Archaeology Review and a specialist in ancient Near Eastern religions, visual culture, and the Bible. She holds degrees in religion from Syracuse University, Duke University, New York University, and Rutgers University, and completed a postdoctoral fellowship on religion and the public conversation at Princeton University.

---

Become a BAS All-Access Member Now!

Read Biblical Archaeology Review online, explore 50 years of BAR, watch videos, attend talks, and more

---

Related reading in Bible History Daily

Cultic Weaponry of Urartu

10 Things to Know About the Assyrian Empire

All-Access members, read more in the BAS Library

Destinations: The Impregnable Rock of Van