Digital Dead Sea Scrolls Reveal New Biblical Insights

Bible and archaeology news

Four and a half years of scans and reinterpretation of newly legible parts of the Dead Sea Scrolls have revealed intriguing insights into 2,000-year-old Biblical texts, including the idea that the roof of Noah’s Ark was pointed, reports Haaretz.


Digital Dead Sea Scrolls: The badly damaged textual fragment describing the apocalyptic struggle of Melchizedeck was barely legible before scanning (top), but once digitized, the faded ink becomes clearer (bottom). Photo: Israel Antiquities Authority.

The Israel Antiquities Authority created a laboratory, equipped with a custom camera, to scan tens of thousands of Dead Sea Scroll fragments and complete the Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library project. Researchers photographed each fragment 28 times in high resolution, employing different wavelengths of light. This technique allowed erased or burned fragments to be readable. The historical dictionary department of the Academy of the Hebrew Language read and reinterpreted these texts and presented their findings at a Dead Sea Scroll conference held at the academy.

In a passage describing Noah’s ark, the once-illegible word following “the ark’s tallness” can now be read as ne’esefet, or “gathered,” and describes the ark’s pointed roof, according to researcher Dr. Alexey Yuditsky. Yuditsky cited other sources as evidence, including a similar Greek verb in the Septuagint (the earliest ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible). Maimonides, the famous medieval Jewish commentator, also suggested the ark had a pointed roof, a claim now supported by the team’s discovery.

Interested in the history and meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls? In the free eBook Dead Sea Scrolls, learn what the Dead Sea Scrolls are and why are they important. Find out what they tell us about the Bible, Christianity and Judaism.

Yuditsky and fellow researcher Dr. Esther Haber deciphered an apocalyptic text that depicts a mythical hero, Melchizedek, triumphing over an enemy, Belial, by freeing “captives.” Researcher Chanan Ariel argues that these captives were forgiven of their sins because of the sabbatical—or shmita—year, thus suggesting that monetary debt could replace sin. This view is similar to the medieval Catholic Church and its use of pardons—and antithetical to Judaism—but the researchers do not know if the practice as recorded on the scroll was the inspiration for the Catholic Church.

Furthermore, after centuries of debate, the researchers discovered what the ptil was that Judah gave to his daughter-in-law Tamar, who was disguised as a prostitute, to guarantee his payment (Genesis 38). Two fragments, once reunited, explained that the “ptil is his belt.”

Exciting new interpretations may continue to be released as the researchers work to scan and interpret the last 20 percent of the scrolls. Who knows what the laboratory and academy will shed light on next?

Read more about the digital Dead Sea Scrolls in Haaretz.

David Malamud is an intern at the Biblical Archaeology Society.

Visit the Dead Sea Scrolls study page in Bible History Daily for more on this priceless collection of ancient manuscripts.


Posted in Dead Sea Scrolls.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Add Your Comments

4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  • Alan says

    Haber — not Habel. My apologies…

  • Alan says

    Researcher Chanan Ariel needs to understand the concept of Grace, which is a judicial pardon. That is not “antithetical to [rabbinic] Judaism,” is it? This “researcher” needs to comprehend what the incarnate (i.e., made lower than angels) Yehoshu’a thought of Pharisaism, which became rabbinic Judaism today (in its many “flavors” of Orthodox, Conservative, Reform/Progressive, etc.)

    Yes, Yehoshu’a of the order of Malki-tsedeq will certainly judge the world on a future Yom Kippur. What is the flip side of atonement? Judgment! Only believers in Him will be given Grace! If you truly understood the mo’edim (appointed times), you would comprehend when and why this must take place.

    Shema Yisrael!

  • Alan says

    I agree with Ryan having “Biblical scholars” — and I use that term very loosely — refer to Malki-tsedeq (Melchizedek) as “a mythical hero.” Maybe Dr. Esther Habel needs to have her credentials re-examined and possibly revoked! After all, she is named after a character in a book that was canonized with NO MENTION OF GOD — even once! — and no evidence of it discovered among the DSS.

    If He were a mythical hero, then why is He mentioned in Genesis 14, Psalm 110, and extensively throughout Hebrews 5-7? Maybe she needs to read Hebrews 7 with comprehension. Or, is that too much to ask of a “Biblical scholar?”

    This is why she and others reject Yehoshu’a as the firstborn of Creation and our Savior who sits at the right hand of the Most High while continually resisting the Ruach HaKodesh to this day:

    Acts 7:51 “You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. 52 Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become; 53 you who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it.” (NASB)

    Shema Yisrael!

  • Joseph says

    I know that Melchizedek allegedly means “my king (melchi = the king to me or my king) is righteous (tsedeq)” Yet I also note that a Jebusite ruler of a later time was called Adonizedek, allegedly meaning “my lord is righteous”. Of course, the priest who supported Solomon’s claim to succeed David was named Zadok. The bible claims he is a descendant of Aaron through Aaron’s son Eleazar. All that is the standard understanding.

    I have heard a second understanding that, admittedly, is speculation. This theory claims that there was a Jebusite deity named Zadok and that Melchizdek and Adonizedek were Jebusite priest/kings whose deity was named Zadok. It goes on to claim that David had the Melchizedek story placed into Genesis to justify the choice of Jerusalem as his capital city. Then, according to this theory, Zadok was actually a Jebusite priest/king who ruled just before David took over Jerusalem and , realizing the new situation, wisely sided with Solomon in his claim to the throne.

    The problem with all of this is that I cannot remember where I first read this. Am I imagining all this or has someone else heard of it and, if so, can you tell me the source?

  • 1 2

    Some HTML is OK

    or, reply to this post via trackback.

Send this to a friend

Hello! Your friend thought you might be interested in reading this post from
Digital Dead Sea Scrolls Reveal New Biblical Insights!
Here is the link:
Enter Your Log In Credentials...

Change Password