Early Christian manuscript books
The books of the Hebrew Bible were originally all written on scrolls. And the bookroll has remained the preferred book form in the Jewish liturgical use of the Torah to this day.
As the word suggests, “scroll” is a rolled up book, made up of any number of sheets (of papyrus, parchment, or paper) glued together to produce a horizontal row of writing support that can be rolled from either end. The word “volume” (from Latin volvere, “to roll”) still reflects this etymology, although the connection to the bygone book form is long lost.
When we say “book” today, we generally mean a tome of bound pages. Known as the “codex,” this common book form has always (over the past two millennia, anyway) looked the same—like any book on your desk. While the origins of the codex are not sufficiently explained, evidence shows that the preserved early Christian manuscripts are more often codices (plural of codex) than the then-established bookrolls. Why?
Some argue that the codex had a technological advantage in that people could check different Biblical passages within a bound tome more readily than they could in a bookroll, which had to be rolled from one side to the other every time someone wanted to look up a passage. Another practical benefit of the codex was in its alleged larger capacity that allowed for the inclusion in one volume of all four gospels or all Pauline epistles or even the entire New Testament. One unintended effect of the latter probably was that the codex invited the imposition of a fixed order to the books it contained. Of all early Christian manuscripts, this intrinsic order is most apparent in the established sequence of the books of the Bible.
In his Archaeological Views column “Early Christian Dilemma: Codex or Scroll?” in the November/December 2018 issue of BAR, Larry Hurtado presents his answers to the intriguing question of why the early Christian texts are overwhelmingly (and progressively) in the form of a codex. A scholar of the New Testament and Christian origins, Hurtado diligently reviews the hard data on early Christian manuscripts, remarking on the growing percentage of codices among the identifiably early Christian texts.
“It seems to me that the more cogent view is that the ancient Christian predilection toward the codex served to distinguish Christian books,” offers Hurtado his judgment on arguably one of the most culturally significant innovations of Late Antiquity—the transition from bookroll to codex as the standard book format.
For a detailed account of the possible reasons behind the early Christian adoption of and preference for the codex, read the Archaeological Views column “Early Christian Dilemma: Codex or Scroll?” by Larry Hurtado in the November/December 2018 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
Not a subscriber yet? Join today.
The “Original” Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls
Book of Leviticus Verses Recovered from Burnt Hebrew Bible Scroll
The Aleppo Codex
The mystery of the missing pages in the oldest Hebrew Bible
What’s Missing from Codex Sinaiticus, the Oldest New Testament?
This Bible History Daily feature was originally published on November 28, 2018.
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access membership. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today!Subscribe Today
These documents were hand copied by scribes. An error on a page is more easily dealt with than a whole scroll
Ms. Spalding is on the right track. 1st Century Christians were evangelizers following Jesus command and example. The Codex would allow easier discussion and teaching. As today, those following those same commands have produced easy to read and study Bibles.
I’m going to go with the idea in the article; it’s easier to compare texts by flipping pages in a codex.
The Jews didn’t do this as much because most of their learning was verbal, and memorized.
When the finally realized they needed to write it down, the Talmud was in book form, standardized so strictly that each page started with the same word across different publications.
Jewish liturgy evolved to accommodate the use of scrolls, by designating Sabbath readings from the Torah to be in sequence; hence, the scroll can be closed by rotating both handles toward the center, keeping the position of the scroll approximately where it will be needed next week, before returning the scroll to the Ark.
Early Christian liturgy was not that standardized, and the Christian scriptures were used more for study than for public readings. Also, writing on both sides, more portable, and easier to hide from police, and lighter.
A codex can be loaned a page at a time for a fellow Christian to study. Persecuted Christians today do that very thing — pass pages of the Bible around the community.
Pages are easier to hide fm hostile pagan authorities than is a scroll.
I once read that codices are more economical because you can write on both sides, which means you can write about twice as much in one volume. Could it be one reason?
Robert, please indicate what Mithraic texts were included in the New Testament…and what are the early Church writings to which you are referring.
One (hopefully not) reason for the transition from scrolls to codex would be that Constantine the Great, working through the offices of Eusebius of Caesarea, combined early Church and Mithraic texts to produce what is now the Christian New Testament. For that to succeed the original source materials had to be destroyed. Fahrenheit 451 crews of the day would have had a simple mantra, “Burn Scrolls!”