**A new interpretation of Babylonian math**

Samuel Pfister
September 20, 2017
1 Comments
8885 views

According to a new interpretation of a 3,800-year-old clay tablet, the ancient Babylonians may have developed the first inklings of trigonometry more than a thousand years before Pythagoras, the namesake of the Pythagorean Theorem, or Hipparchus, considered the father of trigonometry. This fresh examination of the tablet—known as Plimpton 322 (P322)—by scholars at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) could revolutionize our understanding of Babylonian math.

The tablet under scrutiny dates to around 1800 B.C.E. and was discovered in the early 20th century in modern-day southern Iraq by Edgar Banks, a diplomat, archaeologist, explorer, and one of the inspirations for George Lucas’s *Indiana Jones*. Banks sold the tablet to collector George Arthur Plimpton, its namesake, who in 1936 donated his artifacts to Columbia University. The tablet is now on display in Columbia’s Rare Book and Manuscript Library.

Plimpton 322 consists of 60 inscribed cuneiform numbers in four columns and 15 rows on a clay slate only slightly larger than an iPhone. As early as 1945, the organization of the tablet was identified by mathematician Otto Neugebauer and Assyriologist Abraham Sachs as a Babylonian trigonometry table. A modern trig table is essentially a reference of sines, cosines, tangents, and other mathematical functions of angles in right triangles. This table, however, is broken and incomplete, and it is unknown how much of the fragmented tablet is missing.

UNSW mathematicians Daniel Mansfield and Norman Wildberger, authors of a recent article in the journal *Historia Mathematica* reinterpreting P322, agree that the tablet is an example of ancient trigonometry, but they take the claim one step further. Whereas we use angles, sines, and cosines to calculate mathematical equations of right triangles, Mansfield and Wildberger suggest the Babylonians used ratios of side lengths recorded in this tablet to determine unknown lengths.

**From Babylon to Baghdad: Ancient Iraq and the Modern West** *examines the relationship between ancient Iraq and the origins of modern Western society. This free eBook details some of the ways in which ancient Near Eastern civilizations have impressed themselves on Western culture and chronicles the present-day fight to preserve Iraq’s cultural heritage.*

Because the Babylonians utilized a base-60 numerical system (like how we interpret time) rather than our modern base-10, Mansfield and Wildberger conclude that the authors of this tablet could attain more real integers from the fractions of triangle side lengths like those represented on P322. This would make P322 the world’s oldest trigonometry table.

“This is a whole different way of looking at trigonometry,” Mansfield told *Science*. “We prefer sines and cosines … but we have to really get outside our own culture to see from their perspective to be able to understand it.”

However, not all scholars share the researchers’ enthusiasm for the new interpretation. Writing for *Scientific American*, University of Utah mathematician Evelyn Lamb criticizes Mansfield and Wildberger for misrepresenting and exaggerating the importance of the new discovery. Lamb instead contends the duo is amplifying upon the artifact the importance of rational integers, which happens to be a crucial facet of Wildberger’s not-well-accepted theory of “rational trigonometry.”

“It’s hard not to see their work on Plimpton 322 as motivated by a desire to legitimize an approach that has almost no traction in the mathematical community,” wrote Lamb.

While the contents of the tablet are quite clear, the purpose and use of the so-called Babylonian trigonometry table remains questionable. One proposal was that the tablet was merely a pedagogical instrument that instructed or assisted students solving mathematical equations. Alexander R. Jones, Director of the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World at New York University, remains skeptical given the lack of contextual evidence that could hint at a function of the tablet, calling Mansfield and Wildberger’s interpretation “rather speculative.”

The tablet raises important questions about mathematical history and how we understand the way the ancients performed mathematics and qualified the world in which they lived.

“It’s arrogant and will probably lead to incorrect conclusions to look at ancient artifacts primarily through the lens of our modern understanding of mathematics,” Evelyn Lamb opined in *Scientific American*.

While the interpretation and purpose of the tablet remains controversial, the importance of Plimpton 322 to the study of Babylonian math is without question. Examination of this remarkable tablet opens the door to begin interpreting how ancient Mesopotamians rationalized their world and solved problems.

**Samuel Pfister** is an intern at the Biblical Archaeology Society.

**Origins: 3.14159265…** by Kim Jonas

*Why did the ancients invent increasingly subtle and ingenious methods to arrive at an exact value of pi? Human curiosity.*

**The Animals Went in Two by Two, According to Babylonian Ark Tablet**

**Mesopotamian “Receipts” Illuminated by 3D Technology**

**Computer Program Learning to Read Paleo-Hebrew Letters**

**How Bad Was the Babylonian Exile?**

Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.

Dig into the world of Bible history with a BAS All-Access membership. Biblical Archaeology Review in print. AND online access to the treasure trove of articles, books, and videos of the BAS Library. AND free Scholar Series lectures online. AND member discounts for BAS travel and live online events.

Subscribe TodaySend this to a friend

My theory is that it could have been used to find right angles and slopes. The fact that the tablet does not mention angles, but mentions construction could be a clue to how it was used. In terms of modern mathematics, it is simply a formula we learn. But in the ancient world it seems likely they would have used that formula for a purpose. Construction seems the most likely purpose for them to need the information. The fact that the figures are used for a right triangle, or that there most be a right angle is superfluous information. If you plug in the measurements in the exact ratios, you end up with one of the angles being a right angle by default. So using the precise set of numbers without knowledge of the angles, seems to be a way to ensure the angle of the inside corner is 90 degrees. In modern construction the same method is still used today to “check for square” of a structure you are building. If you measure out from a corner 3 feet and make a mark, and out from the same corner 4 feet on an adjoining line and make a mark, then you measure the distance between the two points (which is the hypotenuse), and it has to be 5 feet for the corner to be 90 degrees. If it is more then 5 feet the angle of the corner is more than 90 degrees. If it is less than 5 feet then the angle is less than 90 degrees. In this way, you can adjust as needed to make the adjoining walls meet at 90 degrees, while laying them out before constructing them. This technique is still used today, if you are without a framing square and need to check for square an angle of some framing you are laying out to build. Like a modern day framing square the measurements can also be used for finding the pitch of a roof. You can use the framing square to find the slope of a roof or ramp (3/12, 4/12, 5/12, etc) by plugging in the figures and making sure the three sides are touching, you get the correct angle you need without needing to measure the angle to degrees. It is possible the ratios on the tablet were meant for a similar purpose, using the ratios to find the pitch of a ramp or slope.