BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

“Canceled” Standing Stone Discovered in Judah

Hezekiah, is that you?

Composite Aerial photo of Building 101 excavated at Tel ‘Eton. Composite photograph by Sky View, Griffin Aerial Imaging; Image edited by Yair Sapir. Courtesy of Avraham Faust and the Tel ‘Eton Expedition.

Long before photos, journals, or smartphones, people preserved life’s defining moments in stone. In the Bible, the Israelite erected massebot—standing stones—to commemorate encounters with God, seal covenants, mark boundaries, and memorialize significant events (e.g., Genesis 35:14; Exodus 24:4; Joshua 24:26–27). To the Israelites, these stones functioned much like monuments and memorials do today: They struck awe and gave physical form to memories people wanted future generations to remember.

In a new article, archaeologist Avraham Faust of Bar-Ilan University reports the discovery of a standing stone within an eighth-century BCE elite residence at Tel ‘Eton (likely biblical Eglon). At some point before Assyrians destroyed the site, the stone appears to have been deliberately laid down and concealed within a stone platform in the large home. Does this perhaps represent its cultic deactivation?

The late-eighth century context of the find—in conjunction with other evidence of religious reform from Arad, Be’er Sheva, and Lachish—leads Faust to connect the standing stone with the religious reform of King Hezekiah. If he is correct, the discovery offers evidence of how Hezekiah’s reform may have been received in peoples’ homes.

FREE eBook: Life in the Ancient World.
Craft centers in Jerusalem, family structure across Israel and ancient practices—from dining to makeup—through the Mediterranean world.

join BAS Bible History Daily mailing list

REQUEST FREE BOOK

DOWNLOAD E-BOOK

 

The standing stone was found in a substantial four-room house the archaeologists call Building 101. Faust identifies this structure as the residence of the extended family (bet av) of a local governor or administrative official, destroyed during an Assyrian campaign in the late eighth century.

Excavated over the course of ten seasons (2006–2015), Building 101 was found in an exceptional state of preservation. Its excavated walls stood 3 to 5 feet tall and hundreds of vessels and artifacts were found along with botanical remains. Given the meticulous nature of the excavation, the team has been able to reconstruct how the building functioned “on the eve of its destruction.”

The archaeologists initially uncovered a dense layer of unworked stones covering part of the floor in the building’s largest room. Further excavation revealed that this was not collapsed debris but a deliberately constructed stone platform occupying only the southwestern portion of the room. Buried within the platform were two large, worked stone fragments that fit together as parts of a single stone, measuring approximately 4.5 feet long and weighing an astounding 1,650 pounds.

Close-up view of the room where the two segments of the standing stone were found (highlighted). In the inset (bottom left), the two segments were “joined” with Photoshop to give a sense of how the original stone may have looked. Photo by Sky View, Griffin Aerial Imaging; inset prepared by Dvir Rotem. Courtesy of Avraham Faust and the Tel ‘Eton Expedition.

The stone was the only worked block within the platform. Beneath it lay a specially constructed foundation that ran across the room. Elsewhere in Building 101, similar continuous foundations supported walls. This is the only example where a foundation crossed an interior space, suggesting it was specifically built to stabilize the standing stone. At a later stage, the stone was laid horizontally (possibly causing it to break in two), and the platform was built over it. The effort required to transport the 1,650-pound stone, erect it on a specially prepared foundation within the house, and then later bury it, points to the considerable importance it once held.

Standing stones are well known throughout the ancient Near East and frequently appear in the Hebrew Bible. They have often been interpreted as aniconic representations of deities, and Hezekiah is overtly associated with their removal (e.g., 2 Kings 18:4, 22). Archaeological evidence likewise attests to standing stones at several Judahite sites, including Tell Beit Mirsim, Tel Halif, Khirbet Qeiyafa, and Lachish. At Tell Beit Mirsim and Tel Halif, as at Tel ‘Eton, the standing stones were found in clearly domestic contexts, suggesting that such installations formed part of household religious practice alongside their use in public settings.

Although located deep within the house, the standing stone would have been visible from the entrance and central courtyard, making it a conspicuous focal point of the residence. Also, the stone does not appear to have been casually abandoned or violently destroyed. Instead, it seems to have been carefully lowered and concealed within the platform. This differs from outright desecration, in which sacred objects are deliberately defiled, and from respectful ritual burial of retired cult objects. Faust proposes an intermediate scenario: Local inhabitants obeyed new religious policies requiring the removal of the cult object but treated it with respect due to its long-standing sacred role in the family.

FREE ebook: Jerusalem Archaeology: Exposing the Biblical City Read about some of the city’s most groundbreaking excavations.

join BAS Bible History Daily mailing list

REQUEST FREE BOOK

DOWNLOAD E-BOOK

 

Because the later building predates the Assyrian destruction of the site, Faust argues that the dismantling must have occurred beforehand, reflecting an intentional cancellation of cult rather than a wartime destruction. This interpretation gains support when viewed alongside other late eighth-century discoveries. At Arad, a Judahite temple was carefully decommissioned; at Be’er Sheva, a four-horned altar was dismantled and reused in later construction; and at Lachish, a gate shrine appears to have been intentionally closed before the Assyrian conquest. Although each site remains debated, together they suggest that significant religious change was underway across Judah during this period.

Faust suggests that these sites reveal a consistent pattern of religious transformation across Judah during the late eighth century. While none individually proves the historicity of Hezekiah’s reform, Faust contends that the cumulative archaeological evidence makes some form of coordinated religious reform increasingly plausible.

The study’s broader contribution is methodological. Archaeologists have traditionally searched for evidence of reform in temples and public shrines, yet such buildings are rare and the evidence is contested. Houses, by contrast, were everywhere. For Faust, the careful cancellation of the standing stone at Tel ‘Eton demonstrates the potential of domestic archaeology to illuminate one of the most debated phenomena in Judah’s religious history.

Ironically, the act that ended the stone’s religious function was also the one that ensured its survival. Nearly 2,700 years later, the stone continues to fulfill its original purpose of preserving memory—even if exactly what it commemorates remains an open question.

Lauren K. McCormick is an assistant editor at Biblical Archaeology Review and a specialist in ancient Near Eastern religions, visual culture, and the Bible. She holds degrees in religion from Syracuse University, Duke University, New York University, and Rutgers University, and completed a postdoctoral fellowship on religion and the public conversation at Princeton University.

Become a BAS All-Access Member Now!

Read Biblical Archaeology Review online, explore 50 years of BAR, watch videos, attend talks, and more

Related reading in Bible History Daily

Hezekiah’s Religious Reform—In the Bible and Archaeology

Archaeology Argot: Massebah

All-Access members, read more in the BAS Library

Mysterious Standing Stones

Does the Bible Disapprove of Masseboth?