Few activities in life are as seemingly mundane yet vitally important as eating. Food is one of the bare necessities of life, and everyone—man or woman, young or old, king or servant—must eat. Thus it is perhaps not so surprising that many of the Biblical stories are set within the context of a meal.
From the Hebrew Bible’s accounts of the food Abraham prepares for his divine visitors (Genesis 18:1–8), the stew with which Jacob deceives his aged father, Isaac (Genesis 27), and the all-important Passover meal (Exodus 12) to the New Testament’s miraculous wedding feast at Cana (John 2:1–11), the celebration for the return of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32), and even the Last Supper (Matthew 26; Mark 14; Luke 22; John 13), the Biblical texts provide countless examples of how ancient life was centered around meals. Ritual feasts and banquets in the Biblical world and beyond were particularly important occasions for showing devotion to a deity, solidifying social relationships and ranks, as well as teaching lessons.
In antiquity, even the gods had to eat. Temple officials in ancient Babylon and Egypt were tasked with the daily feeding of their deities. The statues of these deities were more than just depictions for their worshipers; they were themselves divine, and they needed to be fed, bathed, clothed and cared for. An elaborate ritual known as the Opening of the Mouth transformed manmade cult statues into “living” deities.1 The ritual included offering choice meats, honey, fruit and beer for the god’s statue to eat and drink, and even water to wash with after the meal.
In the religious practice of ancient Babylon and Egypt, the gods depended on their worshipers to provide sustenance. Thus in the Book of Zephaniah, the prophet warns that “The Lord will be against them; he will shrivel all the gods of the earth” (Zephaniah 2:11). The root of the Hebrew word translated as “shrivel” means “to make lean” or “to famish,” suggesting that Yahweh could cause rival deities to starve by cutting off their supply of food and drink.
The Israelites, too, made offerings of food and drink to their god, but since Yahweh was not represented by a statue or in any visual form, these sacrifices were burnt up or poured out on the altar. The Book of Numbers records the precise offerings of meat, grain and drink that were required by God twice each day, and more on the Sabbath and Passover festivals (Numbers 28).
Ritual feasts and banquets proved to be important social and political tools throughout Israel’s history. This was especially true in the early years of the Israelite monarchy. As one scholar has noted, “The king’s table was very important for creating and maintaining political support amongst the emerging elite. To be admitted to the table would have been an important marker of social status and influence.”2 Thus was David invited to dine at Saul’s table (1 Samuel 20), and later David invites Uriah the Hittite to eat and drink at his own table in an attempt to cover the king’s affair with Uriah’s wife Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11). According to the Bible, King Solomon’s daily provisions from the district governors of flour, grain, meat and fowl (1 Kings 4:22–23, 26–28) were on a scale large enough to provide sumptuous meals for thousands of people. Likewise, lavish Persian feasts feature prominently at important points in the Book of Esther (1:11, 2:18, 5:4–8, 7:1–8, 9:18–23).3
In later Judaism, meals had become familiar expressions of common identity, social unity and communal celebration.4 The community associated with the Dead Sea Scrolls came together at banquets, as did the Pharisees with others of their kind to partake of pure food and company. Even the weekly Sabbath meal was an occasion for families to come together and enjoy a night of festive fellowship unique to their own heritage.
So great were these celebratory communal meals that the afterlife came to be viewed as a great banquet at the end of time.5 The Hebrew Bible and extrabiblical Jewish writings describe the great messianic feast on the mountain of the Lord: “On this mountain the Lord of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food, a feast of well-matured wines” (Isaiah 25:6ff.). It will be an “unfailing table” (4 Ezra 9:19) where “the righteous and elect ones…shall eat and rest and rise with that Son of Man forever and ever” (1 Enoch 62:12–14). This theme was later picked up by the authors of the New Testament.
A team from the Tell Halif archaeological excavation made their own tannur, a traditional oven referenced in the Hebrew Bible, and baked bread in it. Read all about the experiment in “Biblical Bread: Baking Like the Ancient Israelites.”
Perhaps the oldest and most important feast celebrated by the Israelites and later by Jews is the Passover. With its roots in the Exodus account, the original feast consisted of a sacrificial lamb, bitter herbs and unleavened bread eaten by each family at home (Exodus 12). The blood of the lamb was brushed on the doorposts so that the angel of the Lord would spare the lives of each Israelite household. After the Passover, the next seven days constituted the Feast of Unleavened Bread. (Today both of these feasts are celebrated together under the name Passover.)
Under the Israelite monarchy and the establishment of the Temple in Jerusalem, the sacrifice and celebration of Passover became a centralized affair. It was now a national pilgrimage festival, bringing families to Jerusalem from all over Israel.6 The sacrificial lambs—still a crucial part of the feast’s observance—were brought to the Temple to be slaughtered and offered by the priests. Families who were able ate the Passover meal together there in Jerusalem.
Jews who could not make the pilgrimage to Jerusalem to offer the Passover sacrifice were still able to recognize the holiday by holding a special meal, discussing the significance of the day and observing the Feast of Unleavened Bread. After the destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 C.E., the traditional Passover celebration evolved to look more like this feast. The sacrifice of the lamb was no longer central without the priests and a Temple. The rabbis of the Mishnah (which was edited around 200 C.E.) elevated the non-sacrificial aspects of the feast—including the unleavened bread and bitter herbs—to allow for continued observance. Thus, the Passover seder was born. This structured meal of special foods, questions, teaching and singing—now located once again entirely in the domestic sphere—is still the central feature of Jewish Passover celebrations today.
Some have speculated that the Last Supper, recounted in some form in all four of the Gospels, might have been a Passover seder. However, this is clearly not the case in the Gospel of John. For theological reasons the author put the Last Supper before the Passover feast (John 13:1); Jesus is killed at the same moment the lambs are sacrificed in the Temple—in effect making him the new Passover sacrifice (John 19:28–37). In Matthew, Mark and Luke’s gospels, the Last Supper is explicitly identified as the Passover meal (Matthew 26:17; Mark 14:12; Luke 22:7), but since Jesus and his disciples were celebrating in Jerusalem, decades before the destruction of the Temple, it would not yet have taken the form of a seder. Their feast was a traditional sacrificial Passover meal.
Read Andrew McGowan’s article “The Hungry Jesus,” in which he challenges the tradition that Jesus was a welcoming host at meals, in Bible History Daily.
These meals did not develop in a vacuum, however. Just as the early Israelites had adopted the practice of offering food and drink to their god from their ancient Near Eastern neighbors, so too did later Passover feasts and seders (including the Last Supper) take on the form of traditional Greco-Roman banquets, albeit with their own particular Jewish influences and meaning.
A typical Greco-Roman feast featured diners reclining on couches—propped up on their left elbows—around a central table or a few smaller tables in a dining room (called an andron in Greek and triclinium or stibadium in Latin).7 Among the Greeks, usually only men reclined at these banquets; respectable women (such as the wives of the diners), if present, sat upright at the foot of the couches where the men reclined (cf. Luke 10:39) and usually left before the less wholesome entertainment of the evening began (which often included less-respectable women). Roman women, however, often attended banquets and reclined with the men. Food was generally served in a few communal dishes, in which diners would dip their bread or eat with their hands. Wine flowed freely and was served in bowls. Music, poetry, dancers, debate and even sexual play were all common forms of entertainment at these events.
As in the Israelite monarchy, Greco-Roman feasts functioned as important social and political tools. Scholar Dennis E. Smith noted that “meals were a means of creating and solidifying social bonds.”8 Where a person was positioned at a banquet made it quite clear where he fell in the pecking order among the attendees. The place of honor was immediately to the right of the host and then continued around the table in decreasing order, leaving the lowest guest at the far end. It was not uncommon for the lower guests to receive different (i.e., lower quality) food from what was being served to the host and honored guests.
Understanding this social order and dining structure is important for properly interpreting several passages in the New Testament. Jesus often used the meal setting as a teaching opportunity. Rather than dining only with the elite, he shared his meals with sinners, tax collectors and other social outcasts (Matthew 9:10; Mark 2:15; Luke 5:29).9 Instead of letting the lowest guest at a meal serve the others, he set an example of service by washing his disciples’ feet (John 13:1–17).10 He taught them humility by telling them always to take the lowest place at a table, rather than endure the potential shame of being displaced by a higher-ranking guest (Luke 14:7–10). The Gospel of John says that at the Last Supper the beloved disciple was reclining in the bosom of Jesus, which means that he was seated next to him in the position of honor (John 13:23). The fact that Judas was close enough to accept a piece of bread “dipped in the dish” from Jesus suggests that he, too, may have been reclining nearby. And of course commemoration of this Last Supper developed into the Eucharist—an important ritual and communal meal for all Christians.
The Last Supper is history’s most famous meal. Read Jonathan Klawans’s full Bible Review article “Was Jesus’ Last Supper a Seder?” and his updated article “Jesus’ Last Supper Still Wasn’t a Passover Seder Meal” for FREE in Bible History Daily.
Community meals were also an important teaching tool for Paul—especially with the first Christians at Corinth. Ritual feasts of sacrificial meat offered to the gods at pagan temples were an extremely common occurrence in Corinth, but they posed a conflict of interest for some of these early Christians.11 For Paul, the problem was not really the consumption of idol meat per se (because “we know that ‘an idol has no real existence,’” 1 Corinthians 8:4), but rather the effect that such temple feasts could have on the Christian community. Meals were all about whom you socialized with, so rather than associating with the drunkenness and debauchery of the usual Greco-Roman feasts, and potentially causing a fellow believer to “stumble” (1 Corinthians 8:9–13), Paul preferred private meals shared in common with other Christians—to help build and strengthen the community.
The early Christians also combined another traditional Greco-Roman meal, the funerary banquet, with their own interpretation of the Jewish messianic banquet.12 Roman tombs and sarcophagi depict scenes of the deceased feasting with this family. It was also common for family members and friends to hold a banquet in honor of the deceased in special dining rooms constructed nearby for these memorial meals (called refrigeria in Latin). Christian burials in Roman catacombs show evidence of this practice as well, but for them it meant something more than simply remembering the deceased.
Jesus recalled the tradition of the messianic banquet at the Last Supper: “I tell you that I shall not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink of it new with you in my Father’s kingdom” (Matthew 26:29). Dennis Smith sees another connection in the story of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19–21): “The poor man, who once longed for a crumb from the rich man’s table, is now ’in the bosom of Abraham’ (Luke 16:23), that is to say, reclining just to the right of Abraham himself, in a position of honor, at the banquet of the afterlife.”13 Paintings on the walls of the catacombs depict this heavenly banquet and represent a wish for the deceased to enjoy a sumptuous feast in the society of all the blessed in paradise.14
The Bible History Daily article “A Feast for the Senses … and the Soul” was originally published in March 2013.
Dorothy Resig Willette was the managing editor of Biblical Archaeology Review.
1. See Dominic Rudman, “When Gods Go Hungry,” Bible Review, June 2002.
2. See Nathan MacDonald, Not Bread Alone: The Uses of Food in the Old Testament (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008) p. 157. MacDonald, p. 203.
3. See Bruce Chilton, “The Eucharist—Exploring Its Origins,” Bible Review, December 1994.
4. See Dennis E. Smith, “Dinner with Jesus & Paul,” Bible Review, August 2004.
5. See Baruch M. Bokser, “Was the Last Supper a Passover Seder?” Bible Review, Spring 1987.
6. See Smith, “Dinner with Jesus & Paul.”
7. See Smith, “Dinner with Jesus & Paul.”
8. See Chilton, “The Eucharist—Exploring Its Origins.”
9. See Smith, “Dinner with Jesus & Paul.”
10. See Ben Witherington, “Why Not Idol Meat?” Bible Review, June 1994.
11. See Robin A. Jensen, “Dining in Heaven,” Bible Review, October 1998.
12. See also “The Death of Midas: An Eternal Feast,” Archaeology Odyssey, November/December 2001.
13. See Smith, “Dinner with Jesus & Paul.”
14. See Jensen, “Dining in Heaven.”
Not a subscriber yet? Join today.”
Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update.
Dig into the illuminating world of the Bible with a BAS All-Access membership. Combine a one-year tablet and print subscription to BAR with membership in the BAS Library to start your journey into the ancient past today!Subscribe Today
I found the article to be interesting. However, I will respectfully disagree with the comments that Paul was speaking of meat offered to idols. I was raised with that idea, but with a little research, I’ve come to a different conclusion.
Veganism/Vegetarianism started in Thrace roughly 500BC, and it’s idea was the based on the morality and ethics of using any part of an animal without its permission.
We get a hint of this in Paul’s writings when he speaks of “judgement”, “giving offense”, and other things when speaking of eating meat.
But, it’s a good article.
Dr. Willette, Excellent. Many thanks. The historical record is the record of the upper class. Jesus and his followers were Galilean peasants, no triclinium, just seated on the floor in circles around the food bowls. The Seder accounts we have come from later and higher. How accurate would we be, if we determined an 1860 rural Iowa Christmas from the account of the Harvard faculty in 1980? It is very hard to be sure what it was like, but there are hints. For a different view see
BAR wrote: “…the Biblical texts provide countless examples of how ancient life was centered around meals.” I keep reading in BAR the phrase centered around. You can’t center around something. You can revolve around something or center on something
A gold star to the grammartarian, who is also a gentleman in making his point.
Why did Jesus institute the Memorial with only the apostles and not other disciples who would be taken into the new covenant?
This question seems to be based on the mistaken thought that Jesus gathered with his apostles that evening to institute the Lord’s Evening Meal with the Christian congregation of anointed ones already in the new covenant. Rather, on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., the Christian congregation had not yet been formed, and Jesus came together with his apostles for the annual Jewish Passover meal.
Of course, Jesus had disciples other than the 12 known as apostles. The year before his death, he sent out 70 disciples on a preaching tour. After his resurrection, “he appeared to upward of five hundred brothers at one time.” And there were “about one hundred and twenty” disciples gathered on the day of Pentecost. (1 Corinthians 15:6; Acts 1:15, 16, 23; Luke 10:1-24) But let us consider the group with Jesus when he instituted the annual celebration known as the Lord’s Evening Meal.
Luke 22:7, 8 gives the time frame, saying: “The day of the unfermented cakes now arrived, on which the passover victim must be sacrificed; and he dispatched Peter and John, saying: ‘Go and get the passover ready for us to eat.’” The account goes on: “You must say to the landlord of the house, ‘The Teacher says to you: “Where is the guest room in which I may eat the passover with my disciples?”’” So that evening Jesus was with the 12 for a Jewish celebration. He told them: “I have greatly desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer.”—Luke 22:11, 15.
From its start in Egypt, the Passover was a family celebration. In instituting the Passover, God told Moses that a sheep was to be slaughtered for each household. If the family was too small to consume an entire sheep, a neighboring family could be invited to share the meal. Thus, it is logical that for the Passover of 33 C.E., most of Jesus’ disciples would normally have gathered with their own families for this meal.
But Jesus “greatly desired” to share what was to be the FINAL VALID Passover, and the final night before his death, with his closest followers, who had traveled with him during much of his ministry. At the end of that Passover meal, Jesus told them of a new celebration that was to be held by all his followers in the future. The wine of that yet future Christian celebration would represent the blood of “the new covenant” that was to replace the Law covenant.—Luke 22:20.
On the evening of Nisan 14, 33 C.E., however, the new covenant was not in effect, for the validating sacrifice—Jesus—had not been offered. The Law covenant was still in force. It had not yet been nailed to the stake. Furthermore, it would not be evident until the day of Pentecost that the old covenant with natural Israel had been replaced by the new covenant with spiritual Israel.—Galatians 6:16; Colossians 2:14.
Hence, neither the 11 faithful apostles nor any of the other disciples were in the new covenant that evening. And Jesus was not showing any disapproval of the other Jewish disciples by letting them gather with their families to celebrate the Passover.
Should We Celebrate Holidays?
THE Bible is not the source of popular religious and secular holidays that are celebrated in many parts of the world today. What, then, is the origin of such celebrations? If you have access to a library, you will find it interesting to note what reference books say about holidays that are popular where you live. Consider a few examples.
Easter. “There is no indication of the observance of the Easter festival in the New Testament,” states The Encyclopædia Britannica. How did Easter get started? It is rooted in pagan worship. While this holiday is supposed to commemorate Jesus’ resurrection, the customs associated with the Easter season are not Christian. For instance, concerning the popular “Easter bunny,” The Catholic Encyclopedia says: “The rabbit is a pagan symbol and has always been an emblem of fertility.”
New Year’s Celebrations. The date and customs associated with New Year’s celebrations vary from one country to another. Regarding the origin of this celebration, The World Book Encyclopedia states: “The Roman ruler Julius Caesar established January 1 as New Year’s Day in 46 B.C. The Romans dedicated this day to Janus, the god of gates, doors, and beginnings. The month of January was named after Janus, who had two faces—one looking forward and the other looking backward.” So New Year’s celebrations are founded on pagan traditions.
Halloween. The Encyclopedia Americana says: “Elements of the customs connected with Halloween can be traced to a Druid [ancient Celtic priesthood] ceremony in pre-Christian times. The Celts had festivals for two major gods—a sun god and a god of the dead . . . , whose festival was held on November 1, the beginning of the Celtic New Year. The festival of the dead was gradually incorporated into Christian ritual.”
Other Holidays. It is not possible to discuss all the observances held throughout the world. However, holidays that exalt humans or human organizations are not acceptable to Jehovah. (Jeremiah 17:5-7; Acts 10:25, 26) Keep in mind, too, that the origin of religious celebrations has a bearing on whether they please God or not. (Isaiah 52:11; Revelation 18:4)
It’s great that you are getting ideas from this paragraph as well as from our discussion made at this time.
Let’s not forget that today we may eat whatever kind of meat or seafood that we are truly thankful for as long as we give thanks to God in true and honest faith with a good conscience. As long as we’re quoting the “New Testament’…
9 On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour:
10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance,
11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth:
12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.
13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
14 But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.
15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.
Even though this was to show that God was delivering salvation “also” to the Gentiles, he was using a well known principle from the “Old Testament” to show that a change is now transpiring, and that though the Gentiles were once considered to be unclean, that now “in Christ” they may be considered clean.
This also agrees with 1 Tim 4:4-6
4 For “every” creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
6 If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained.
I need to point out that the whole process of sacrifice practiced in the second temple period (and probably in the first as well), involved HUMAN consumption of foods. For the most part (although there were exceptions), if an animal offering was brought to the temple, the slaughter of the animal was ritualized, as well as it’s initial butchering. The meat was then consumed. For the most part, it was consumed by the Cohanim and the Leviim, but depending on the kind of offering brought it could be consumed by the person bringing the offering or by the poor or by others.
The korban Pesach (Passover offering) in particular worked as follows: a group of people (50-100) would sign up to celebrate Passover together. They would bring a lamb with them. Representatives of the group would bring the lamb to the temple, where it was slaughtered and preliminarily butchered in a mass ritual. The lamb was then brought back to where the group had gathered in Jerusalem, a bar-b-que would be set up (although it wasn’t called that then), and the lamb would be roasted on a spit. The group would consume the lamb and had to finish it by the middle of the night. After the destruction of the temple, there was no Jerusalem and no temple, and the Passover seder was born.
To understand where this is coming from, you need to understand what it took to consume meat in ancient times. You couldn’t go to the grocery – there was no refrigeration for one thing. Instead, a farmer would have an animal. He decided that he wanted to slaughter the animal for meat. He would put out notices that he was going to do so, and people would sign up for parts of the animal. When he felt he had sold enough of the animal, he would notify the people and a ritual slaughterer. The animal would then be killed and butchered, and people would take cuts of meat home with them. They then had 3 days to use it. If it wasn’t consumed in 3 days, it could be washed and used for another 3 days, but that was it.
In a society like that, eating meat is a rare and privileged event (except for the very wealthy). The conjecture is that eating meat had to be elevated to a holy event. There is conjecture that in Biblical times, all meat was consumed as a korban.
[…] Dorothy D. Resig | Biblical Archeology Society […]
I enjoyed the article and Rick’s comments though I don’t necessarily agree with all that he says.
One thing to remember is that as the article says, these things didn’t develop in a vacuum. We know from history that the Jews, from the time of the Persians were spread all over the known world. It was physically impossible for many of them to come to Jerusalem every year (many lived outside the Empire in the Parthian Empire that had taken over much of what the Persiand had ruled and were mortal enemies of the Romans!!!! Do you think they would be allowed to visit Jerusalem! Last time that happened the Jewish King of the time was so paranoid he had all the infants in Bethlehem executed because he feared they were going to use one of them to dethrone him!)
The Jews, recognising that it was impossible for many to come to the temple had begun to develop (during the Persian period) the idea of the Synagogue! Is it possible that the idea of that most sacred of Jewish feasts, the passover had also begun to change and over the years had changed to something closer to the feast the jews celebrate today than what we think they may have celebrated during the time of the temple!
Also, while I agree that Jesus death may not have occurred at the very moment of the sacrificial lambs, actually I think it didn’t because that would have meant that they were essential, at least for that year, but he came to replace them and as such i feel that the article is right in using the title.
Finally, both are wrong to say that Jesus was ‘killed’ because while it’s clear both the Jews and the Romans (Pilate reluctantly) intended to kill him he actually gave up his life, something that both he and the four gospels all attest to. This may seem like semantics but there is a big difference, he gave up his life for us, and he did it willingly, he could have stopped the events at any time (John 18 vs 36. Matt 26 vs 52-56) but he chose to endure it for us.
To Dorothy Resig, Managing Editor.
You have accurately pointed out that some have speculated that the Last Supper was a Passover seder. However, in the previous paragraph you have already accurately dismissed this faulty speculation when you pointed out that the seder meal was not in existence at the time of the Last Supper.
But the article begs correction when it speculates that for “theological reasons” the book of John places the Last Supper prior to the single day of Passover. There are no theological reasons for John to do this; he did it because it was an accurate rendering of the events as they occurred. The Last Supper occurred on Wednesday of crucifixion week and the single day of Passover was on Friday of that same week.
Looking further into the same paragraph it states: “In Matthew, Mark and Luke’s gospels, the Last Supper is explicitly identified as the Passover meal (Matthew 26:17; Mark 14:12; Luke 22:7)…”. The is not the case at all. The three synoptic gospels are in agreement with the book of John, that the Last Supper occurred on Wednesday and the single day of Passover was on Friday.
Matthew 26:17 KJV, “Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to [Yahoshua], saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?” “The first of unleavened” is not identifying the single day of Passover. It is identifying that the time (the days of) unleavened are upon them. The days of unleavened may begin as early as Monday of that week (see Exodus 12:3). The disciples request as to where they were to begin the single day of Passover preparations does not mean that they expected to have a Passover that very day. Of course they were not expecting that, for they knew full well that the single day of Passover was two days in the future.
Mark 14:12 KJV, “And the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover, his disciples said unto him, Where wilt thou that we go and prepare that thou mayest eat the passover?” “The first day of unleavened” here in Mark means the same thing that it did in Matthew 26:17. However, additional information has been provided to us. Now we are told that the time of unleavened does not mean Passover plus the following seven days of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. The phrase “when they killed the passover” distinctly lets us know that they are speaking only of the single day of Passover.
Luke 22:7 is not the complete parallel passage to Matthew 26:17 and Mark 14:12. The complete comparison passage is Luke 22:7-9 KJV, “7 Then came the day of unleavened bread, when the passover must be killed. 8 And he sent Peter and John, saying, Go and prepare us the passover, that we may eat. 9 And they said unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare?” And, as can be expected, Luke is in complete agreement with Matthew, Mark, and John.
This leads us to the statement in the article in greatest error: “Jesus is killed at the same moment the lambs are sacrificed in the Temple—in effect making him the new Passover sacrifice (John 19:28–37).” John 19:31 is the only verse that gives us a time reference to work with. John 19:31 KJV, “The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the [stakes] on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.” The sabbath day was not the weekly sabbath, it was the Passover sabbath day. This Scripture shows that the day of Yahoshua’s death was on one of the preparation days for the Passover; that is, the fifth day (Thursday) of the week in this case. These Pharisees and chief priests went to Pilate on the day of Passover (the sixth day, Friday, Matthew 27:62-64) and requested that the tomb be secured. The day before that (the fifth day, Thursday), Yahoshua was crucified (Luke 23:53-54). The day before that (the fourth day, Wednesday) He ate the Last Supper with His disciples. One cannot have a Passover Feast on a day other than Passover, which is Friday, except during little Passover on Friday the fourteenth day of the second month under special circumstances as explained in Numbers 9:11.
I have given here a summary of the exegesis of these passages. There is a longer and more detailed version available from my teaching “The Last Supper”.