BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

Reading Genesis

A new tool explains how to study the Bible effectively

Read the full original review by Kent Harold Richards as it appeared in Biblical Archaeology Review , Sept/Oct 2011

 

Reading Genesis: Ten Methods

Edited by Ronald Hendel

New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010, 244 pp.
$85 (hardcover), $27.99 (paperback)

Reading Genesis: Ten MethodsA recently published book of essays edited by Ronald Hendel puts forward, in the voices of ten different Biblical scholars, new and enlightening ways to read and understand some of the most well-known stories in the Book of Genesis. Reviewed by Kent Harold Richards, this latest compendium of Biblical scholarship furthers our understanding of Genesis Bible study and demonstrates through each essay how to study the Bible effectively. Richards warns, however, that this book is not for the beginner. While he credits Ronald Hendel with concisely but thoroughly providing proper context for the essays, Richards warns that Ronald Hendel’s new book is predicated upon an understanding of Genesis Bible study, including both basic knowledge of the text and familiarity with traditional critical approaches.

Reading Genesis

Reading Genesis: Ten Methods edited by Ronald Hendel provides new approaches to Genesis Bible study and is a new tool that explains how to study the Bible effectively.

Several of the topics addressed in this volume on Genesis Bible study include culture memory perspectives as demonstrated by focusing on slightly different dimensions of the Jacob story, reflections on gender and sexuality in Genesis, specifically as they pertain to the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, as well as the issues surrounding various Biblical translations. One of the essays in Ronald Hendel’s book emphasizes that the awareness of contemporary and now-obscure literary sources–and their redaction–is important in order to achieve a fuller understanding of the first few chapters of Genesis, and thus Genesis Bible study. Such an approach is lauded by Richards, who then goes on to support another essay’s premise that a useful tool in how to study the Bible effectively is not to apologetically smooth over questions that arise from readings of Biblical texts, but rather to approach the texts critically.

Richards’s review of this new book by Ronald Hendel makes a strong case for continually striving for fresh and new perspectives in the approach to Genesis Bible study. Richards’s endorsement of Reading Genesis: Ten Methods edited by Ronald Hendel–and reflecting the scholarship of ten dynamic voices in the field–is a strong case for adding both the book and the critical methods it advocates to the practice of Genesis Bible study.

Related Posts

Neolithic Bread from Catal Hoyuk. Courtesy Necmettin Erbakan University
Mar 18
Neolithic Bread at Catal Hoyuk

By: Nathan Steinmeyer

Mar 16
Eunuchs in the Bible

By: Megan Sauter

Tyrian Purple
Mar 15
Ancient Israel’s Tyrian Purple Factory

By: Nathan Steinmeyer


4 Responses

  1. […] Reading Genesis – Biblical Archaeology Society […]

  2. rhodad says:

    I have met one person in my entire 77 years that has the answers! Contact Rev. B.R. Hicks Speaks and writes Hebrew, and the most studied human being of the Bible of anyone I have ever heard of.
    Resides in New Albany, Indiana 47150

  3. Joanna says:

    Sons of god aré angels…and if you read with more attention about how different Noah’s son were….you can imagine that God created Adam with illimitable fiscal posibilieties in his descendants…then adaptation to envoirment influed as well…My English is not good enough…sorry.

  4. joseph sampson says:

    I have a problem in reconciling the creation account as given in Genesis 1 with the realities of racial diversification. Traditionally, we have been taught that God created Adam and Eve and they were placed in the Garden of Eden. We are also taught that they are the original parents of all mankind. My problem arises, when we look at the different racial divisions of mankind.

    I am suggesting, that if we just broad brush the issue of the origin of racial diversity in humanity, by saying we are all of the same stock, then we are effectively accepting the heresy of evolution with its hypothesis that all life mutates/adapts to its environment and will physically change to suit these adaptations. I have long rejected evolution as a viable basis for anything and have stuck to the creation account.

    I am suggesting, therefore, that original pairs of humans were simultaneously created and that because of widespread disobedience to the laws of God, were dispersed out of Eden and settled in diverse places, eventually becoming synonymous with “development poles” scattered throughout the Middle East, Asia, Africa, India, etc.(Semitic, Negroid, Sinoid, et al.) I am especially intrigued by Genesis 6:2. Who are the “sons of God” referred to here and where did they originate from, to make this type of entry into the scriptures?
    Will someone please clarify this for me, or recommend reading that can guide me in this respect?

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


4 Responses

  1. […] Reading Genesis – Biblical Archaeology Society […]

  2. rhodad says:

    I have met one person in my entire 77 years that has the answers! Contact Rev. B.R. Hicks Speaks and writes Hebrew, and the most studied human being of the Bible of anyone I have ever heard of.
    Resides in New Albany, Indiana 47150

  3. Joanna says:

    Sons of god aré angels…and if you read with more attention about how different Noah’s son were….you can imagine that God created Adam with illimitable fiscal posibilieties in his descendants…then adaptation to envoirment influed as well…My English is not good enough…sorry.

  4. joseph sampson says:

    I have a problem in reconciling the creation account as given in Genesis 1 with the realities of racial diversification. Traditionally, we have been taught that God created Adam and Eve and they were placed in the Garden of Eden. We are also taught that they are the original parents of all mankind. My problem arises, when we look at the different racial divisions of mankind.

    I am suggesting, that if we just broad brush the issue of the origin of racial diversity in humanity, by saying we are all of the same stock, then we are effectively accepting the heresy of evolution with its hypothesis that all life mutates/adapts to its environment and will physically change to suit these adaptations. I have long rejected evolution as a viable basis for anything and have stuck to the creation account.

    I am suggesting, therefore, that original pairs of humans were simultaneously created and that because of widespread disobedience to the laws of God, were dispersed out of Eden and settled in diverse places, eventually becoming synonymous with “development poles” scattered throughout the Middle East, Asia, Africa, India, etc.(Semitic, Negroid, Sinoid, et al.) I am especially intrigued by Genesis 6:2. Who are the “sons of God” referred to here and where did they originate from, to make this type of entry into the scriptures?
    Will someone please clarify this for me, or recommend reading that can guide me in this respect?

Write a Reply or Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Send this to a friend