The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible

Few Biblical archaeology discoveries have attracted as much attention as the Tel Dan inscription, or “House of David” inscription

The fragmentary Tel Dan stela, containing the Tel Dan inscription (or “House of David” inscription) provided the first historical evidence of King David from the Bible. The Aramean king who erected the stela in the mid-eighth century B.C. claims to have defeated the “king of Israel” and the “king of the House of David.” Photo: Zev Radovan/www.biblelandpictures.com.

Few modern Biblical archaeology discoveries have caused as much excitement as the Tel Dan inscription—writing on a ninth-century B.C. stone slab (or stela) that furnished the first historical evidence of King David from the Bible.

The Tel Dan inscription, or “House of David” inscription, was discovered in 1993 at the site of Tel Dan in northern Israel in an excavation directed by Israeli archaeologist Avraham Biran.

The broken and fragmentary inscription commemorates the victory of an Aramean king over his two southern neighbors: the “king of Israel” and the “king of the House of David.” In the carefully incised text written in neat Aramaic characters, the Aramean king boasts that he, under the divine guidance of the god Hadad, vanquished several thousand Israelite and Judahite horsemen and charioteers before personally dispatching both of his royal opponents. Unfortunately, the recovered fragments of the “House of David” inscription do not preserve the names of the specific kings involved in this brutal encounter, but most scholars believe the stela recounts a campaign of Hazael of Damascus in which he defeated both Jehoram of Israel and Ahaziah of Judah.

What made the Tel Dan inscription one of the most exciting Biblical archaeology discoveries for scholars and the broader public was its unprecedented reference to the “House of David.” The stela’s fragmented inscription, first read and translated by the renowned epigrapher Joseph Naveh, proved that King David from the Bible was a genuine historical figure and not simply the fantastic literary creation of later Biblical writers and editors. Perhaps more important, the stela, set up by one of ancient Israel’s fiercest enemies more than a century after David’s death, still recognized David as the founder of the kingdom of Judah.
 


 
For more on the Tel Dan inscription and other exciting Biblical archaeology finds reported in BAR, get the free eBook Ten Top Biblical Archaeology Discoveries.
 

 
The “House of David” inscription had its skeptics, however, especially the so-called Biblical minimalists, who attempted to dismiss the “House of David” reading as implausible and even sensationalistic. In a famous BAR article, Philip Davies argued that the Hebrew term bytdwd referred to a specific place (akin to bytlhm for Bethlehem) rather than the ancestral dynasty of David. Such skepticism aside, however, most Biblical scholars and archaeologists readily accepted that the Tel Dan stela had supplied the first concrete proof of a historical King David from the Bible, making it one of the top Biblical archaeology discoveries reported in BAR.

Even though the “House of David” inscription has confirmed the essential historicity of King David from the Bible, scholars have reached little consensus about the nature and extent of his rule. Was David the great king of Biblical lore who founded his royal capital at Jerusalem and established an Israelite kingdom? Or was David a ruler of only a tribal chiefdom, as Israel Finkelstein of Tel Aviv University contends? Questions like these often arise from Biblical archaeology discoveries and lie at the heart of the complex relationships among archaeology, history and the Bible.
 


 
Eilat Mazar’s excavations in Jerusalem’s City of David uncovered massive structures from the era associated with King David. Read Did I Find King David’s Palace? by Eilat Mazar online for free as it appeared in the January/February 2006 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review.
 

 
Based on “Issue 200: Ten Top Discoveries,” Biblical Archaeology Review, July/August September/October 2009.

Posted in Artifacts and the Bible, Biblical Artifacts, Inscriptions.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Add Your Comments

14 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. David says

    One correction: The Bible is historical evidence, just as other ancient writings are evidence, regardless of their accuracy or bias. The Tel Dan inscription is the first non-Biblical or archaeological evidence of David’s existence.

  2. links says

    It’s difficսlt tto find exoerienced people about thiѕ topic, but yyou soujոd like you know what you’re talking about!
    Thanks

Continuing the Discussion

  1. In Earth as it is in Heaven - Zola Levitt blog - Myles Weiss | Zola Levitt Ministries linked to this post on November 16, 2011

    [...] abound in scientific and popular journals about the king who is the ancestor of the King (see Biblical Archeology Review). One scorching debate takes place in the venerable National Geographic (Volume 218, Number 6, page [...]

  2. Blog, Apologetics linked to this post on March 29, 2012

    [...] scholars rejected King David and pronounced him as a mythical figure. Yet, archeologists began to uncover tablets with his name on them forcing them to re-evaluate the mythic [...]

  3. In the Footsteps of King David linked to this post on May 9, 2012

    [...] course, the 1933 Tel Dan “House of David” inscription provided archeological proof of David’s rule and the ongoing [...]

  4. Israel and Stuff » Archaeology Proves Existence Of Biblical Bethlehem – Artifact Discovered linked to this post on July 11, 2012

    [...] attributed to him in the Bible have been discovered. However when the archeology discovery of a clay seal mentioning the Kingdom of David was recently brought to light the naysayers were left [...]

  5. Where did the wives of Cain and Abel come from? - Page 25 (politics) linked to this post on March 23, 2013

    [...] of myths is not a very serious endeavor. There is zero evidence of David or Soloman either. http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/d…d-bible-story/ Reply With [...]

  6. The Exodus - Fact or Fiction? - Page 15 linked to this post on May 16, 2013

    [...] the modern era. Well, there was a kingdom of Israel with a royal family from the house of David: The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible Few modern Biblical archaeology discoveries have caused as much excitement as the Tel Dan [...]

  7. SEEK AND YOU SHALL FIND | campfireministries linked to this post on July 7, 2013

    [...] 5. The fragmented Tel Dan “House of David” inscription stele (a stone slab) was found in 1993 by Israeli archaeologist Avraham Biran in northern Israel. The Aramaic characters date back to the eighth-century B.C. The inscription commemorates the victory of an Armenean King, believed to be Hazael of Damascus, over two neighboring kings of the “House of David” from countries to the south, believed to be Jehoram of Israel and Ahaziah of Judah. The inscription was the first non-biblical reference to and first historical evidence of King David, according to the Biblical Archaeological Society (http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/artifacts-and-the-bible/the-tel-dan-insc…). [...]

  8. +were There Two Different Jesuses?+ - Page 9 - Interfaithforums.com linked to this post on August 15, 2013

    [...] David from the Bible, making it one of the top Biblical archaeology discoveries reported in BAR. — The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible – Biblical… The important thing is to not stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for [...]

  9. The Criterion Collection Forum Blog linked to this post on November 11, 2013

    David King Zip Coin Purse…

    [...] st Turkey, here the origins of agriculture, writing, codified laws and urban pla [...]…

  10. Obama's war on Christianity continues..... - Page 27 linked to this post on November 26, 2013

    [...] Thanks921 Originally Posted by Froggy Well, here's a partial list of "peoples" who had "rulers" in the surrounding area at the time of the hebrews… Canaanites Phoenicians Philistines Moabites Edomites Ammonites Samarians Arabites Assyrians And that doesn't include all the conquering peoples such as the egyptians, babylonians, persians, hittites, hurrians, greeks, romans, etc. Archaeologists can't find any proof david or solomon even existed. You are wrong The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible ? Biblical Archa… [...]

  11. Of Camel Bones and History | Scott’s Blog linked to this post on February 14, 2014

    [...] Moreover, while archaeological evidence can prove the existence of something, the absence of evidence is not proof of a lack of existence.  If you see a picture of me at a party, you have evidence that I was there, but my not being in a picture is not proof that I wasn’t there.  Several biblical accounts previously dismissed as legendary or mythical due to lack of archaeological evidence have later found verification such as Sodom & Gomorrah and King David. [...]

  12. Of Camel Bones and History | Scott Sealy linked to this post on March 24, 2014

    […] Moreover, while archaeological evidence can prove the existence of something, the absence of evidence is not proof of a lack of existence.  If you see a picture of me at a party, you have evidence that I was there, but my not being in a picture is not proof that I wasn’t there.  Several biblical accounts previously dismissed as legendary or mythical due to lack of archaeological evidence have later found verification such as Sodom & Gomorrah and King David. […]


Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.


Enter Your Log In Credentials

Change Password

×