Overcoming Religious Illiteracy: Not as Simple as A, B or C

A Bible History Daily-exclusive contribution by "Bible in the News" author Leonard J. Greenspoon

Leonard Greenspoon

Leonard Greenspoon

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof is among today’s best journalists. His courageous and principled campaigns against human trafficking, among other evils, assure that his views will receive a serious, respectful hearing. All the sadder, then, that he has added his stature to a misguided, if well intentioned, campaign to improve religious literacy.

In his column of Sunday, April 27, he bemoans the fact that “only one-third [of Americans] know that Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount and 10 percent think that Joan of Arc was Noah’s wife.” I suspect that this latter number—not really so bad when we realize that three times that number of Americans don’t know the name of the current vice-president—will decrease with the release of Darren Aronofsky’s “Noah” movie. Even a casual viewer of that film is sure to notice that Noah never asks “Joan” to make the coffee or complains when “Joan” asks him to take out the trash.

This is not to say that on average Americans display great depth or breadth of knowledge in regard to religion in general or the Bible specifically. And we have a great deal of room for improvement in our knowledge of science, politics, or any number of other vital subjects. So I affirm that Americans should undoubtedly be more literate about religious communities and religious texts.

But what exactly does that mean? After forty years of teaching religious studies at public and private universities, I have yet to meet anyone who thinks that Joan of Arc was Noah’s better half. Such an identification is silly, but I don’t think it is a major cause for alarm.

For Christians not to know that, as recorded in the Gospel of Matthew (but nowhere else in the New Testament), Jesus spoke the Sermon on the Mount is unfortunate—and also shows a shocking lack of familiarity with Monty Python. But isn’t it actually more important to know the contents of the Sermon than to know its author?


 
The religion section of most bookstores includes an amazing array of Bibles. In our free eBook The Holy Bible: A Buyer’s Guide, prominent Biblical scholars Leonard Greenspoon and Harvey Minkoff expertly guide you through 21 different Bible translations (or versions) and address their content, text, style and religious orientation.
 

 
Herein lies the problem: Is achieving Biblical literacy the same thing as acing a multiple-choice or true/false quiz that mixes important insights with trivia and even strained interpretation? I don’t think so.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

To explore this further, let’s look at some of the other “mistakes” Kristof illuminates: “Moses climbs Mount Cyanide and receives 10 enumerated commandments.” Doesn’t everyone know that it was Mt. Sinai, even if no one knows exactly where the mountain was or is? And yes, it’s true that the “ten commandments” are not enumerated in Exodus or Deuteronomy, but frankly I have no idea where Kristof got the idea, which he passes on as fact, that “there were 12 (unnumbered) commandments.” Nor is it correct, as Kristof asserts, that “Jews, Protestants and Catholics have different versions depending in part on how they compress them into 10.” This is wrong, and Kristof does no favor to proponents of religious literacy by passing these statements off as true.

Does anyone really think, as Kristof reports, that the epistles are the wives of the apostles or that Sodom and Gomorrah were the Sid Vicious and Nancy Spungen (remember them?) of their day? Is either the Roman Catholic doctrine of Mary’s immaculate conception or Armenia’s early adoption of Christianity a bedrock issue in defining a person as religiously literate? I don’t think so.

At the same time, Kristof does correct the apparently still widespread and surely significant misconception that English is the original language of the Bible (Kristof alludes to, without mentioning by name, Texas governor “Ma” Ferguson as an outstanding proponent of that view). And he sagaciously castigates those who mistakenly believe that Jesus was the victim of serial crucifixions, from which he resurrected and re-resurrected himself repeatedly.

All of this is to say that all bits of information about religion are not equally valuable or, for that matter, equally valid. If we are serious about religion being taken seriously in the world, then we’d better be sure where our pedagogical (and other) priorities lie. I for one would breathe easier in a world where the Ten Commandments play a meaningful part in people’s lives even when most people can’t recite them in order or distinguish the Exodus version from the wording in Deuteronomy.

 


 
When this article was originally published on May 16, 2014, it elicited a great deal of commentary from our readers. In a follow-up submitted to BAS on May 26, 2014, author Leonard J. Greenspoon expounded on the concept of Biblical literacy in a response to the first 22 Bible History Daily readers’ comments. Greenspoon’s response was published below on June 2, 2014. –Ed.

I am gratified to see that my post on Biblical literacy has elicited almost two dozen responses. At the same time, it is necessary to observe that a number of the responses have little to do with the issue of what constitutes—or does not constitute—a Biblically literate individual or society.

To return to my post: there are two main points I had in mind. First is a negative one; namely, that measuring Biblical literacy as if it were equivalent to a giant multiple-choice quiz is wrong-headed. Among other problems, this approach misconceives the actual way in which we learn, or in my view, should learn, the Bible. If I know the different orderings of the books of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, it is not because I set out to learn them, but because this is useful information to anyone who is conducting serious research on this material. The same holds true for the names and order of the kings of Judah or Israel. In fact, the same holds true in almost any field: I asked a scholar of American history whether there is any special value to knowing the names and order of our presidents. He affirmed that not only that this wasn’t especially valuable information on its own, but that he knew the order of presidents only for the periods of American history in which he specialized.

As I sought to demonstrate briefly in my posting, a lot of what passes for “secure information” about the Bible is anything but. Those with a very long memory may recall that I dealt with this matter in in great detail in the Bible Review article “What America Believes About the Bible.” If what you want to test people on is (for example) as straightforward as, “Who was Solomon’s father?” then you probably won’t have too much of a problem. But anything much beyond that raises all sorts of questions simply within the context of the Bible itself.

This leads to my second main point, the positive one: If you are truly interested in what the writers of the Bible wrote, first read the text itself (in its original languages or in a translation that you find suitable for your purposes). Commentary, whether faith-based or secular, is useful, often obligatory for full understanding of a Biblical passage or concept. But, in my view, there is no substitute for—or shortcut to—a reader’s direct engagement with the text. It is for this reason that I prefer for my students to begin with a Biblical text as “naked” as possible; that is, with no or only a few footnotes or marginal notes. In my experience, too many people resort to the notes instead of trying first to work out a textual or exegetical problem on their own.
 


 
For more than a dozen years, Leonard J. Greenspoon’s “The Bible in the News” column has been one of the most popular sections of Bible Review and Biblical Archaeology Review. A new volume, developed exclusively for eReaders, this book brings together Greenspoon’s “The Bible in the News” articles and columns into a single collection, from his August 2000 feature article “Extra! Extra! Philistines in the Newsroom!” up to his column in the November/December 2012 issue of BAR. Read more here >>
 

 
This procedure does not lead to unanimity of opinion, but, then again, I don’t think that is what the writers of the Bible sought. When carefully read, many Biblical passages encourage, or perhaps even demand, active interaction with their readers, who should always be open to surprise, dismay and on occasion (I hope) encouragement.

Reading the Biblical text itself then is the beginning of Biblical literacy. Someone who never does this is Biblical illiterate, no matter what else he/she does or what facts he/she knows.

There are, I suppose, at least two ends toward which Biblical literacy points. The first is the acquisition of insights based on reading the text, supplemented by commentaries of all sorts. The second is the incorporation of these insights into our lives, individually and communally.

I do not have THE answer as to how to accomplish these two ends or goals, which in my view are complementary. All serious discussion of the Bible—positive, negative and all points in between—must be anchored in a reading of the text itself, which constitutes the appropriate context for all subsequent analysis, interpretation and application of the text. Those who enter into discussion informed in this way are Biblically literate—no matter how we measure it. Those who do not are, simply put, Biblically illiterate.
 


 
Leonard J. Greenspoon is the Philip M. and Ethel Klutznick Chair in Jewish Civilization at Creighton University in Omaha. He is editor-in-chief of the Studies in Jewish Civilization series, which is publishing its 24th volume this fall. He also co-authored, with the late Harvey Minkoff, BAS’s free guide to modern Bible translations, The Holy Bible: A Buyer’s Guide.

Posted in Biblical Archaeology Topics.

Tagged with , , .

Add Your Comments

29 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Axel says

    If you don’t know how Kristoff came to 12 commandments, please just go and read Exodus and Deuteronomy for yourself. When I tried it, I came up with 13 distinct commandments, but the text explicitly states 10. On Wikipedia you can find an illuminating table of the manifold ways the different denominations have found to mark off the ten. While I would not insist on my 13 against Kristoff’s 12, I’m confident every unbiased reader will make them more than ten.

  2. Axel says

    Addendum:
    Sorry about mangling Kristof’s name.
    The different numbering by Jews, Catholics and Lutherans is a correct. While the Wikipedia table is a convenient overview, is not my source but I can demonstrate it from primary sources like official catechisms.

  3. kim says

    What difference does it make 10 or 12, if people don’t follow them? If you follow them, let it be 100 or 1000 ways to love God and love your neighbor.

  4. Chris says

    Dear Mr. Greenspoon,

    I read your article w/interest. I have a question in response to this statement:

    “I for one would breathe easier in a world where the Ten Commandments play a meaningful part in people’s lives even when most people can’t recite them in order or distinguish the Exodus version from the wording in Deuteronomy.”

    How do you propose to instill “The 10″ into people’s lives here in America?
    What method and procedure would you use?
    How would you implement it nation-wide?
    Where would you begin?
    And how would you ensure that political leaders and bureaucrats – esp. law-makers – “feared God and kept His commandments” while exercising the functions of their public office?

    Thanx for entertaining my questions … Chris

  5. MARILYN COLLIER says

    At least he knew which part of the Bible to find them. Yes, the lack of knowledge is appalling, but that has always been a problem.

  6. Stan says

    I believe instead of trying to teach religion as a serious subject, it’s time to wean the public from the make believe nonsense.

    To people who are craving for Ten Commandments, better read them (if you are able) and understand them, what they really mean or have them explained to you.

    As a Jew, I am tired of the snake oil charlatans are trying to steal and misrepresent my history

  7. Patr says

    What about those same university students in my religious studies service courses who have no idea that karma is more than ‘what goes around comes around,’ that yoga is a religious discipline, that their centering meditation is a Buddhist practice, that all men who wear turbans are not Muslims, that some Muslim women veil as a political statement not because they are oppressed, that Christians didn’t write the Ten Commandments and Hebrew is not a translation of the Christian Bible? I should be thankful, I suppose, for the basic level of religious literacy that acknowledges how far we have come since Bible times. At least, as I have been reminded several times in our online discussion forums, Jews no longer boil their children in milk!

  8. Jeanie says

    Many would say that the “renumbering” of the Commandments by the Roman Catholic Church is substantive, and that they renumbered in order to downplay the prohibition of “graven images” (as Catholic churches are often full of statues). The result is well described (though from a Catholic point of view) at http://lonelypilgrim.com/2013/10/09/st-augustine-on-how-to-divide-the-ten-commandments-did-catholics-change-the-ten-commandments/ as follows:
    Rather than dividing “You shall have no other gods before me” and “You shall not make for yourself any graven image” into two separate commandments, as do the Reformed and Evangelicals, Augustine saw that “making for oneself an idol and bowing before it” (Exodus 20:4) was but an elaboration of having other gods before God, and grouped the two into one commandment. In Catholic catechetical formulae, the “graven images” part is often omitted — not because we are abridging Scripture, but because it is easier for kids to memorize that way, and the part about “graven images” is pretty much redundant. Augustine instead divided “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house” and “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife” into two commandments.

  9. Armand says

    I was under the impression that the Emperor Theodosius made Christianity the “official” religion of at least most of the Roman empire in 381 after unilaterally deciding to end the arguments about the nature of Christ. Not sure where the Armenian adoption comes in. Yes, Americans are appallingly ignorant of their own religions, however that has always made it easier for them to be manipulated by it. The very same reason the Church was set against its’ translation into vernacular. No wonder American fundamentalists insist Jesus rode dinosaurs during the 6000 year history of the world! The more you read, the less you believe it as divinely written.

  10. Bob says

    It would be nice if the religious literacy spoken of was to extend TO INDIA. The Mystic Masters of northern India (Radha Soami Satsang Beas, RSSB.org) will readily explain that the climax of the newly discovered Gospel of Judas, for just an example, is Judas sacrificing HIMSELF, and NOT Jesus! This changes everything. Now we can see the origin of the fabled “Betrayal” mythology in the canon. Nothing will ever be the same. Just add time, Christianity is now ending — since about 1990, when Dr. Robert Eisenman proved Paul was the “Liar” in the literature from Qumran. James was the Righteous Teacher, but no mention there of any “Jesus”. Hmm. Wonder why… judaswasjames dot com

  11. Peter says

    Given the claims Jesus makes about himself in the Sermon on the Mount (e.g. “You have heard that it was said …. but I say to you” and his claim to fulfill the Law and the Prophets (5.17) it is abundantly clear that it is NOT the case that it is “actually more important to know the contents of the Sermon than to know its author.” Jesus is saying that most important thing is to know and follow him. Jesus claimed to be far more than a prophet and teacher.

  12. Chris says

    I read your article w/interest. I have a question in response to this statement:

    “I for one would breathe easier in a world where the Ten Commandments play a meaningful part in people’s lives even when most people can’t recite them in order or distinguish the Exodus version from the wording in Deuteronomy.”

    How do you propose to instill “The 10″ into people’s lives here in America?
    What method and procedure would you use?
    How would you implement it nation-wide?
    Where would you begin?
    And how would you ensure that political leaders and bureaucrats – esp. law-makers – “feared God and kept His commandments” while exercising the functions of their public office?

    Thanx for entertaining my questions … Chris

  13. Jonathan says

    In the original Hebrew, the Bible does not refer to them as the Ten Commandments, but rather as the Ten Statements (which encompass more than Ten Commandments)

  14. Gerrisimov says

    As far as I know, there is no proof of the existence of god, so without proof of god’s existence any framework of philosophy and law based on the idea are invalid.

    My personal belief is that early man was terribly bothered by maggots in his freshly caught meat. Who of you likes to see a maggot wriggling in his Big Mac? Exactly, so early man invented the idea of god as someone to blame for the maggots appearing in their meat.

  15. Chris says

    Dear Mr. Greenspoon,

    Is this a political blog?

    Do you ever answer your respondents in here? If so, under what conditions?

    Am I wasting my time attempting to initiate a dialogue w/you?

    Cheers … Chris

  16. Dan says

    Is it any wonder that Americans are ignorant of what the Bible actually says? Most have never read it for themselves. All they know is what they have heard on television or seen in movies, and rarely do even pastors and rabbis ever talk about the Bible on camera, it’s mostly a discussion of political issues and/or man-made platitudes. Then you have the “history channels” and their parade of Bible scholars and “experts,” who rarely believe the supernatural parts of the Bible, spouting all kinds of nonsense. Even in churches in my area (the American South), on any given Sunday you are just as likely to hear a sermon that offers more thinly-veiled Republican politics than the words of Jesus. We should focus on having people read the Bible for themselves. Yes, I know it is dangerous to established religion for them to do so, but that’s what we should do to combat Bible illiteracy.–Dan Bruce, The Prophecy Society http://www.prophecysociety.org

  17. John says

    Chris,
    You sure are trying to turn it into a political blog. Greenspan just wants to live among law keepers rather than lawbreakers as any sane person would want.

    Stan,
    You can hardly claim Jewish history is your history when you are not truly Jewish. You would have been banished from any ancient Jewish village and Jewish society by claiming the Bible is make believe nonsense. The Bible itself says you were to be cut off from the people.

    Gerri,
    Exactly what kind of evidence would you require to believe in the existence of God? If the existence of intelligent creatures isn’t enough, then I fear there is no evidence that would ever persuade you. Nobody ever saw an object as complex as a watch and assumed it created itself, yet 3 billion base pairs of DNA precisely arranged created itself?

  18. Chris says

    John,
    Thanx for replying.
    Please tell me what public forum isn’t “political”?
    Mr. Greenspoon is an “expert” in his field.
    He offers his expert “opinion”, which I agree with.
    However, he offers no “remedy” to the problem.
    Would you agree w/me that, in today’s world, the “talk” has eclipsed the “action” to the point that nothing good gets done by those who “talk” about it?
    Would you agree w/me that the time for “talking” is long past, and long since been time for “action”?
    I want to see Mr. G’s “plan of action”.
    Maybe then we can see things change for the good.
    Cheers … Chris

  19. Gene R. says

    Of course the Mosaic Law Covenant actually contained hundreds of laws in edition to the Ten Commandments. When Jesus was asked (Mathew 22:36-40) which is the greatest commandment in the Law, he answered “You must love Jehovah you God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind. This is the greatest and first commandment.(quoting from Deuteronomy 6:5). The second, like it, is this, ‘You must love your neighbor as yourself’.'(quoting from Leviticus 19:18) On these two commandments the whole Law hangs, and the Prophets.”(New World Translation). So these two laws surpassed the Ten Commandments written on stone tablets. Of course if we love Jehovah God we won’t worship other gods, bow to idols or use his name in a worthless way. If we love our neighbor, we will not kill him, steal from him, commit adultery with his wife or testify falsely against him.

    Although the Law was fulfilled in Christ and passed away, many of the principles of the law are still incumbent on Christians, essentially the Law of the Christ. Many of these principles can be found in the Sermon on the Mount. (Matthew 5-7). Incidentally, the Mosaic Law Covenant was never given to Gentiles–this covenant was between God and Israel.

  20. Gene R. says

    Sorry, addition, not “edition”.

  21. David says

    “This Covenant was between G-d and Israel” – yes, thank you, and therefore has not passed away but is still in force.

    As for Biblical literacy, I think it’s a great idea. There are far too many people who think they know the Bible and would like to enforce it on the rest of us when they have no clue what it really says.

    And As for Dr Greenspan having a plan to enforce following Scriptures on society, that’s a total red herring. Nowhere does he say he has one or wants one.

  22. Gene R. says

    The first Christians were all Jews and with the coming of Christ they understood that they were discharged from the Law (Romans 7:6) .He was referred to as the “Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29) Jeremiah’s prophecy said that the (Mosaic) Law would be replaced by a better law (Jeremiah 31:32,32). The Mosaic Law was based on animal sacrifices that had to be offered up for sins. This had to be done on a regular basis because such sacrifices did not give permanent forgiveness of sins. Jesus’ human sacrifice was the basis or foundation of the “New Covenant” and forgiveness of sins for those who put faith in it.

    Later, when Gentiles, peoples of the nations, became Christians they were not under The Mosaic Law (never were), but under the “Law of Christ” or the New Covenant. The prophecy of Amos 9:11, 12 indicated that Jehovah would take out of the nations a people for His name.(explained further in Acts 15:14-18) These Gentiles would join the Jewish Christians to become the new “Israel of God” (Galatians 6:16)
    The Mosaic Law contained many, many specific commands concerning the offering of animal sacrifices. Over a one year period thousands of animals were sacrificed on the altar in front of the Temple and on Yom Kippur blood was to be brought into the Most Holy of the Temple and sprinkled before the Ark of the Covenant. There was a priesthood appointed to carry out the instruction’s according to the Law. None of these things could be done after 70 C.E. when the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed. There is no longer a Temple or Altar or Most Holy or Ark of the Covenant. There is no longer a literal priesthood or anyway to establish one(the high priest had to be a descendant of Aaron and the other priests had to be from the tribe of Levi) The Mosaic Law had served its purpose and was fulfilled and has been replaced by the New Covenant. The moral principles of love of God and love of neighbor remain and are highlighted in the Christian Greek Scriptures.

  23. David says

    Peter was apparently not so convinced he was “discharged from the law” if I remember correctly; didn’t he argue vociferously with Paul?
    In any case, if everything ended with JC, why did sacrifices continue for another approximately 37 years?
    You may think the Law was replaced but as you know, millions of Jews have maintained it for two millennia in the face of cruelty, torture and death. G-d gave the Law and only He can end it. And He hasn’t yet.

  24. Gene R. says

    David: Thank you for your comments. The only case I could find involving Paul and Peter on this matter was recorded at Galatians 2:11,12 where in Antioch Paul had to chastise Peter for putting on a pretense by not eating with or associating with his Gentile brothers in order not to offend some visiting Jewish Christians (some Jewish converts were slow in accepting Gentiles as equals). Peter knew better,that the wall between Jews and Gentiles had been removed in the Christian community but allowed his fear of man to influence his actions In fact Peter baptized the first Gentile convert,the uncircumcised Roman Centurion Cornelius

    On the other matter, it is true that the Jewish priests continued to offer sacrifices at the temple until 70 C.E. when the temple was destroyed. This is to be expected since the Jewish religious leaders refused to accept Jesus as the Messiah and so to them it was status quo until the Romans destroyed the temple (Jesus predicted the destruction of the temple.Matthew 23:37,38 and Matthew 24:1,2). For nearly two thousand years the Jewish people have been unable to maintain the Law’s requirement of animal sacrifices at the temple in behalf of sins. Even on the Day of Atonement a High Priest cannot enter the Most Holy according to the command and sprinkle blood before the Ark of the Covenant. Would this not indicate the will of Jehovah? Animal sacrifices were no longer needed, the Messiah had come.

    The Mosaic Law was pictorial of the Messiah coming to offer the sacrifice of his life for the benefit of all who put faith in him, Jew and Gentile. Thus the law is fulfilled. His blood validates the New Covenant.

  25. David says

    However, we do now offer prayer in place of animals; each of the daily services represents one of the sacrifices offered at the equivalent times. And we look forward, as we did in Babylonian days, to the rebuilding of the Temple, this time for the last time.

  26. John says

    It amazes me that Christians today believe God’s 10 commandment law has been done away with. Only a universalist could believe that because without the law, there is no sin and hence all will be saved and inherit eternal life. Heaven will simply be a continuation of Earth with murder, adultery, stealing, blaspheming God etc. What government can function without laws? Paul is clear that we ESTABLISH the law through faith. The law that was done away with was the ceremonial law. An angel of God tore the veil separating the holy from the most holy because God’s presence was no longer there. Had it been, everyone who looked inside would have been killed. The new covenant that God makes is the writing of the 10,commandment law on our hearts, not the doing away of the law. What Christ’s sacrifice accomplished was forgiveness of sins. If the law could simply be done away with, Christ died for no reason.

    Christ warns against those who teach that His law, the one written with His own finger, was done away with.

    Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Matt 5:19

    Note that you are not in Heaven. Those in Heaven refer to these unsaved people as the least.

  27. whitney says

    This is so sad and true, I live in a diverse and oppionated church community where we really don’t need to study the bible,just be happy about what we believe in and see Jesus in everything we do.We all were upset about the Noah movie, because it didn’t reflect our beliefs. Our ministers will keep us self centered and self affirming,but contributing. And should there ever be anything of a critical importance for us to understand in the good book, they will dumb it down to a form we will like. And of course they will always guide us in a godly way through voting and social issues. Aloha Jesus and me are having a great day! I don’t need to read, the spirit will just move me.

  28. William says

    I believe I can address your post in a thought provoking way:

    A P’rushim (Pharisee) who was Torah expert (a lawyer/legal expert: νομικός nomikos) asked Yeshua (Jesus) a sh’eilah (technical question about Jewish halakhah) to trap him:

    Mattityahu (Mathew) 22:36 (CJB)
    36  “Rabbi (Teacher), which of the mitzvot (commandments) in the Torah is the most important?”

    Yeshua answered by quoting part of the Sh’ma:

    Mattityahu (Mathew) 22:37 (CJB)
    37  He told him,

    “‘You are to love Adonai your God
    with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.’

    He then goes on to say:

    Mattityahu (Mathew) 22:38 (CJB)
    38  This is the greatest and most important mitzvah (command).

    But Yeshua doesn’t stop there . . . He says a second is similar to it:

    Mattityahu (Mathew) 22:39 (CJB)
    39  And a second is similar to it,

    ‘You are to love your neighbor as yourself.’

    The final statement sets the stage for explaining biblical illiteracy:

    Mattityahu (Mathew) 22:40 (CJB)
    40  All of the Torah and the Prophets are dependent on these two mitzvot (commandments).”

    Since there was no B’rit Chadashah (New Covenant/New Testament) written at this point, Yeshua is literally saying:

    “All of the Bible (The Torah and the Prophets)
    is dependent on these 2 commandments”

    Dependent on: Learning it – understanding it – applying it. Hillel said something similar when he said:

    “Love your neighbor as yourself, the rest is just commentary – go and learn it.”

    So here are the questions that need to be asked to address the root of biblical literacy:

    1. Do you know where in the text the (2) MOST IMPORTANT commands are? If not, WHY not?
    2. Have you memorized the (2) MOST IMPORTANT commands? If not, WHY not?
    3. Have you memorized them in their entirety? If not, WHY not?
    4. Do you filter the text through these 2 commands or do you filter it through some man-made theological supposition/doctrine/dogma?
    5. Do you APPLY these commands to your life – daily?
    Are the words ALWAYS on your heart?
    Do you talk about them when you get up?
    Do you talk about them when you go down the road?
    Do you talk about them when you sit down?
    Do you talk about them when you lie down?
    Do you teach them CAREFULLY to your children?

    I meet very few that know where they are in the text. I meet fewer still that have memorized them . . .

    How can you have a relationship with the Living God and say you follow Him if you don’t KNOW or APPLY the very things He said are “the most important commandments in the text?”

    How can you have a relationship with the Living God and say you follow Him if you don’t KNOW or APPLY the very things He said that “the ENTIRE Torah and Prophets are DEPENDENT on?”

    Be blessed my Brothers and Sisters,
    Shalom (Peace)!

  29. Gene R. says

    When referring to the passing away of the Mosaic Law, does the Bible directly say that the Ten Commandments(or Ten Words) were included in what came to an end?

    Romans 7: 6, 7: “Now we have been released from the Law, because we have died to that by which we were being held fast….What, then, are we to say? Is the Law sin? Certainly not! Really, I would not have come to know sin had it not been for the Law, For example, I would not have known covetousness if the Law had not said: ” You must not covet.” (Here, immediately after writing that Jewish Christians had been “released from the Law,” what example from the Law does Paul cite? The Tenth Commandment, thus showing that it was included in the Law from which they had been released.)

    2 Corinthians 3:7-11: “If the code which administers death and which was engraved in letters in stones, came about in a glory, so that the sons of Israel could not gaze intently at the face of Moses, because of the glory of his face, a glory that was to be done away with, why should the administering of the spirit not be with even greater glory? …For if that which was to be done away with was brought in with glory, how much greater would be the glory of what remains.(Reference is made here to a code that was “engraved in letters in stones” and it is said that “the sons of Israel could not gaze intently at the face of Moses” on the occasion when it was delivered to them. What is this describing? Exodus 34: 1, 28-30 shows that it is the giving of the Ten Commandments; these were the Commandments engraved on stone. Obviously these are included in what the scripture says “was to be done away with.

    Does doing away with the Mosaic Law, including the Ten Commandments, imply the taking away of all moral restraint?

    Not at all; many of the moral standards set out in the Ten Commandments were restated in the inspired books of the Christian Greek Scriptures. (see Matthew, Chapters 5 through 7; [The Sermon on the Mount,] and Galatians 5:18-24) No everlasting life in heaven or earth for those violating the Law of the Christ without repenting and exercising faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ. Better to accept the New Covenant, written on hearts, and accepting God’s merciful provisions, than trying to gain salvation by works of Law (the Mosaic Law).

    Reference:”Reasoning in the Scriptures” (1985) Pages 345-351


Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.


Enter Your Log In Credentials

Change Password

×