- Biblical Archaeology Society - http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org -
Solomon, Socrates and Aristotle
Posted By Biblical Archaeology Society Staff On December 15, 2014 @ 12:10 pm In Ancient Cultures | 14 Comments
Read Theodore Feder’s article “Solomon, Socrates and Aristotle” as it originally appeared in Biblical Archaeology Review, September/October 2008. The article was first republished in Bible History Daily in October 2012.—Ed.
The earliest depiction of a Biblical scene comes from a site that is perhaps better known to some for its erotic art than for its religious devotions: Pompeii. The city was buried in volcanic ash in 79 A.D. following the eruption of nearby Mt. Vesuvius. It was a devastating tragedy for Pompeii’s residents but a boon to modern scholars and art historians.
In the building known as the House of the Physician, excavators found a wall painting clearly depicting King Solomon  seated on a raised tribunal and flanked by two counselors. As described in the Bible, two women have come to the Israelite monarch, each claiming to be the mother of the same infant. When Solomon orders the baby to be divided in half, the real mother, shown at the foot of the dais, pleads with him to spare the child and announces her willingness to relinquish her claim. The other woman is shown standing by the butcher block on which the infant has been placed. As a soldier raises an axe to do the king’s bidding, she seizes what she believes will be her portion, saying, according to the Biblical text, “Let it be neither mine, nor thine, but divide it.” It is obvious who the real mother is. The child is given to her unharmed as soldiers and observers look on, marveling at Solomon’s wisdom (1 Kings 3:16–28).
The wall painting has now been removed and is on exhibit at the Museo Nazionale in Naples. While it is therefore well known to scholars, it has not previously been noted that this is the earliest depiction of a full-fledged Biblical scene known to us!
There is good evidence that Jews lived in Pompeii. Kosher brands of the locally popular fish sauces were packed there and appropriately labeled Kosher Garum and Kosher Muria (garum castum, muria casta).1  A two-word inscription, Sodoma Gomora, also survives from a house front in Pompeii and may have been written by a Jew or, less likely, by an early Christian, either before the eruption of Vesuvius or by a digger soon afterwards. It is perhaps more affecting to imagine its having been hastily written in the midst of the eruption by someone who analogized the town’s impending fate with that of the two doomed Biblical cities.
My own feeling, however, is that it is more likely that the painting of Solomon  displaying his wisdom was commissioned by a non-Jew. True, the Second Commandment’s prohibition against depicting the human form was not always obeyed by Jews in the Roman era.2  But the injunction was particularly strong in the years leading up to the Jewish rebellion against Rome in 66 A.D., when protests against graven and painted images received a strong political as well as religious impetus. On stylistic grounds, the painting can be dated from the period immediately preceding the Vesuvius eruption in 79 A.D.
In any event, it is clear that the work reflects the influence of the Hebrew Bible. The Torah (the Pentateuch or Five Books of Moses) was translated into Greek beginning in about 270 B.C., and the rest of the Bible was added in the immediately following centuries. According to one account, King Ptolmey II Philadelphus of Egypt wanted a copy of the Hebrew Bible for his great library in Alexandria.b  More likely, it was made by Jews for the Jews of Alexandria who did not know Hebrew. According to a traditional story, 70 scholars were isolated from each other on an island in Alexandria and instructed to prepare a Greek translation. When they were finished, all Greek copies were identical. Hence, this Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible is still known as the Septuagint.c  The Greek translation became available not only to the many Greek-speaking Hellenized Jews of the Mediterranean world, but to non-Jews as well. This text served as both a literary and iconographic source-book for Jew and gentile alike. Although the owner of the House of the Physician could in theory have been either a Jew, a so-called God-fearer, an early Christian or a Roman gentile, he was most likely a gentile, based simply on demographic grounds. In short, gentiles were more numerous, more likely to attain wealth, and under no prohibition with regard to depicting the human form.
The painting contains all the essential narrative elements in the Biblical story without omissions or adumbrations. What’s more, it appears to have sprung whole from the artist’s imagination, as there is no known precedent in the history of art. As noted above, present are Solomon, the two mothers, the butcher block, the baby, the soldier waiting to divide it, and the onlookers who will attest to Solomon’s wisdom. The story has not received a more telling and cogent depiction in the 2,000 years since the painting’s creation.
Among the onlookers are two figures in the lower left corner of the composition who are more fully delineated than the very lightly sketched group of figures immediately behind them. The features and poses of these two witnesses reflect surprise, wonder and admiration.
I believe these two figures are stand-ins for Socrates and Aristotle, introduced as a way of associating the wisdom of Solomon with that of the Greek philosophers. Put another way, their presence in the composition attests to the respect Greek philosophy could accord to Hebrew wisdom. Such a juxtaposition in art of wise men from the two civilizations was unprecedented, has rarely been done since, and is of great cultural and historical significance.
The figure to the right stands with his right leg thrust forward; his chin rests on his unsupported right arm in a classic thinker’s pose. He would be more natural if he were pictured seated. His features, however, correspond to a prototype for Aristotle: a full head of curly hair, little or no beard in this case and a regular profile. It is likely that the painter modeled Aristotle on a seated prototype derived from a Greek original that was copied in Roman times. A surviving example is the seated Aristotle from the Galleria Spada in Rome. There the pose is almost identical to the standing Aristotle of the Pompeian wall painting; the left leg is thrust forward and the head rests on an upraised arm which is in turn supported by Aristotle’s bent knee.
The association of Jews with Greek wisdom and philosophy, though rare, was not entirely unknown in Hellenistic literature. In one of the earliest Greek references to the Jews, Clearchus of Soli (c. 300 B.C.), a disciple of Aristotle, quotes Aristotle as saying that the Jews are descended from Indian philosophers.3  In a similar vein, Theophrastus (372–288 B.C.) remarks that “being a race of philosophers, they converse with each other about divinity, and during the night they view the stars, turning their eyes to them and invoking their God with prayers.”4  This could serve as a still-accurate portrayal of synagogues in the modern era, where evening prayers (Maariv in Hebrew) are traditionally begun at sundown with the appearance of the first stars.
Numenius of Apamaea (Syria), a second-century A.D. Platonist, praised the Jews for worshiping an incorporeal God and declared that Plato had been but “a Moses in Attic garb,” here, too, making an association between the great thinkers of both cultures.5 
The owner of the House of the Physician approved the depiction of this scene and likely proposed the subject matter to the painter. In selecting an episode from the Hebrew Bible, the patron departed from the canon of classical religious subject matter and elevated one from the Scriptures of a people whose influence at the time was spreading throughout the empire and would one day, in its Christian formulation, pervade it.
1.  August Mau, Pompeii, Its Life and Art, trans. Francis W. Kelsey (New York: Macmillan, 1902), p. 16.
2.  See Harold H. Ellens, “The Library of Alexandria: The West’s Most Important Repository of Learning,”  Bible Review 13:01.
3.  On Sleep, quoted by Josephus, Against Apion I, 176–182.
4.  On Piety, cited by Poryphry, third century A.D., in On Abstinence, 2.26. Meyer Reinhold and Louis Feldman, Jewish Life and Thought Among Greeks and Romans (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996), primary readings, p. 7.
5.  Salo Wittmayer Baron, A Social and Religious History of the Jews, vol. 2 (New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1937), p. 157.
a.  See Louis H. Feldman, “The Omnipresence of the God-Fearers” ; Robert S. MacLennan and Thomas Kraabel, “The God-Fearers—A Literary and Theological Invention” ; and Robert Tannenbaum, “Jews and God-Fearers in the Holy City of Aphrodite,”  all in BAR, September/October 1986.
b.  See Jacob Neusner, Symbol and Theology in Early Judaism (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991), pp. 211, 216. Also, Erwin R Goodenough, Jewish Symbols in the Greco-Roman Period, 13 vols. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1953–1968).
c.  Philo of Alexandria gives a full account of its composition in his “Life of Moses” (2.6: 31–37, 44) See also Leonard J. Greenspoon, “Truth and Legend About the Creation of the Septuagint, the First Bible Translation,”  Bible Review 05:04.
Article printed from Biblical Archaeology Society: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org
URL to article: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/solomon-socrates-and-aristotle/
URLs in this post:
 King Solomon: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/temple-at-jerusalem/the-doorways-of-solomons-temple/
 Ten Top Biblical Archaeology Discoveries: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/free-ebooks/ten-top-biblical-archaeology-discoveries/
 a: #end01
 1: #note01
 Solomon: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-sites-places/temple-at-jerusalem/searching-for-the-temple-of-king-solomon/
 2: #note02
 b: #end02
 c: #end03
 Beyond the Bible: http://store.bib-arch.org/Beyond-the-Bible/productinfo/9HLX3/
 3: #note03
 4: #note04
 5: #note05
 “Solomon, Socrates and Aristotle”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=34&Issue=5&ArticleID=7
 The Split of Early Christianity and Judaism: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/post-biblical-period/the-split-of-early-christianity-and-judaism/
 Lovers’ Tale: A Closer Look at Daphnis and Chloe in the Garden of Eden: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-interpretation/lovers-tale/
 First Person: Art as Bible Interpretation: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/people-in-the-bible/first-person-art-as-bible-interpretation/
 Stoa Poikile Excavations in the Athenian Agora: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/stoa-poikile-excavations-in-the-athenian-agora/
 1.: #note01r
 2.: #note02r
 “The Library of Alexandria: The West’s Most Important Repository of Learning,”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBR&Volume=13&Issue=01&ArticleID=10
 3.: #note03r
 4.: #note04r
 5.: #note05r
 a.: #end01r
 “The Omnipresence of the God-Fearers”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=12&Issue=05&ArticleID=04
 “The God-Fearers—A Literary and Theological Invention”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=12&Issue=05&ArticleID=02
 “Jews and God-Fearers in the Holy City of Aphrodite,”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBA&Volume=12&Issue=05&ArticleID=03
 b.: #end02r
 c.: #end03r
 “Truth and Legend About the Creation of the Septuagint, the First Bible Translation,”: http://members.bib-arch.org/publication.asp?PubID=BSBR&Volume=05&Issue=04&ArticleID=09
Copyright © 2014 Bible History Daily. All rights reserved.