Neolithic Figurine Could Lead to Reassessment of Prehistoric Israel

Recent discovery has implications for understanding Yarmukian culture

beit-hilkia-figurine

This clay figurine discovered near Beit Hilkia takes the shape of a full-figured woman, according to archaeologists, and is identified with the Neolithic Yarmukian culture that flourished in prehistoric Israel 8,000 years ago. Photo: Israel Antiquities Authority/Yitzhak Mermelstein.

A small Neolithic figurine that may have been used for cultic purposes has been unearthed near Beit Hilkia in south-central Israel, Haaretz reports. Despite its size, the figurine’s presence in the region could have archaeologists rethinking the nature of the cultures living in prehistoric Israel some 8,000 years ago.

Israel Antiquities Authority archaeologists Edwin van den Brink and Yitzhak Mermelstein were conducting a salvage excavation ahead of the installation of a new pipeline when the Neolithic figurine was discovered. The clay figurine takes the shape of a full-figured woman, according to Haaretz, and is similar to Neolithic figurines found in northern Israel, mostly around the site of Sha‘ar Hagolan (“the Gate to the Golan”). These figurines are attributed to the Yarmukian culture that flourished in northern Israel around 8,000 years ago, during the Pottery Neolithic period (6400–5800 B.C.E.). The Yarmukian culture was the first in this region to produce pottery.

shaar-hagolan-figurine

Found at Sha‘ar Hagolan, this 5-inch-high, red-painted figurine depicts a seated woman with cowrie-shell eyes and exaggerated hips, buttocks and thighs. Photo: David Harris.

Archaeologists Yosef Garfinkel and Michele Miller describe the human figurines discovered at the Neolithic settlement of Sha‘ar Hagolan in an Archaeology Odyssey article:

The most common—and engaging—human figurines are seated clay figurines with cowrie-like eyes. We have five complete, or nearly complete, examples, along with 70 fragments of various body parts. Each body part was made separately—head, torso, right leg, left leg. The components were assembled to create the basic figurine. Then small details were added: Eyes, ears and nose were put on the head; a veil was placed over the nape of the neck; arms, breasts and clothing were added to the body; fingers and fat folds were created by using different incision techniques; and the navel was depicted by a puncture mark. Remaining patches of paint on the figurines indicate that sometimes the entire figurine was painted red, while at other times only specific parts of the body were painted with red lines. The use of the color red—which is often associated with blood, and thus with life and fecundity—on these figures is intriguing. With one exception, all the anthropomorphic figurines represent women.

[…]

How were these figurines used? Probably for some cultic function. Were they fertility talismans, made to assure the fruitfulness of flocks and fields? Did they represent some sort of deity to be worshiped, perhaps a mother goddess? Or were they representations of beloved ancestors, used in an ancestor cult? No one knows. What we can say is that they appeal to our modern aesthetic sense.

As the point where three of the world’s major religions converge, Israel’s history is one of the richest and most complex in the world. Sift through the archaeology and history of this ancient land in the free eBook Israel: An Archaeological Journey, and get a view of these significant Biblical sites through an archaeologist’s lens.

neolithic-sites-map

Photo: Google Earth

Many scholars believe that there was another distinct culture living in south-central Israel during the time that the Yarmukian culture flourished in northern Israel. The ceramic repertoire of this culture based in south-central Israel is identified with that found in Stratum IX at the site of Jericho; the culture is therefore referred to as “Jericho IX culture” or “Lodian culture.”

What makes the figurine found near Beit Hilkia remarkable is that it is attributed to the Yarmukian culture, but was excavated in the region where the Jericho IX culture flourished.

“I think that in the end this is one culture with differences in the way pottery is made,” excavation codirector Edwin van den Brink told Haaretz. “It seems they had a single system of beliefs.”

“The question is whether the figurines represent a single ritual world in which there is an image with a bountiful chest, wide hips and maybe pregnancy,” explained excavation codirector Yitzhak Marmelstein. “The most important question is whether the figures were made in the south or brought from the north.”

According to Haaretz, the archaeologists plan to test the composition of the figurine’s clay to determine whether it came from the north or south region of prehistoric Israel.
 


 
Which finds made our top 10 Biblical archaeology discoveries of 2015? Find out >>
 

 

Related reading in Bible History Daily:

Why Study Prehistoric Israel?

Going Paleo: Prehistoric site in Israel offers menu for a Paleolithic diet

No Matches? No Problem. Ancient Fire-Making in Israel

Manot Cave Skull Links Modern Humans to Neanderthals

12,000-Year-Old Shaman Funeral Reflects Natufian-Period Changes

“Lay Some Flowers on My Grave”: Oldest grave flowers discovered in Israel

The Ancient Bean Diet: Fava Beans Favored in Prehistoric Israel

Archaeologists Identify the World’s Earliest “Matches” in Ancient Israel

The Göbekli Tepe Ruins and the Origins of Neolithic Religion
 


 

Posted in Ancient Israel, News.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Add Your Comments

7 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. David says

    Cue the responses: “I thought this was supposed to be a Christian publication. How could anyone live in Israel 2000 years before the creation of the world?”
    :-)

  2. john says

    they can tell, because the figurine is stamped “Yarmuk & Co. 6012 BC” on the bottom

  3. Ed says

    And also, “Made in China”.

  4. Vicki says

    Isn’t the association of red with blood and fecundity culturally specific? Colours mean different things in different cultures. It may not actually represent blood either. There must be other questions or theories that can be applied to this figurine. What can be said from the context? No contextual information is given here.

  5. Ron says

    Got to smile at the people who buy into the chronology of Bishop Ussher.

  6. Prodigal48 says

    Whenever God instructed the Israelites to take an area and drive the idol-worshippers out, it seems like that would indicate pretty clearly that other cultures were there. I don’t see the contradiction some are raving about here.

  7. David says

    Actually, prod, you may be commenting on another column. The responses here appear to be cogent and clever.


Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.


Send this to friend

Hello! You friend thought you might be interested in reading this post from http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org:
Neolithic Figurine Could Lead to Reassessment of Prehistoric Israel!
Here is the link: http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-israel/neolithic-figurine-could-lead-to-reassessment-of-prehistoric-israel/
Enter Your Log In Credentials

Change Password

×